this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
207 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

2868 readers
290 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

  6. Avoid posting AI-generated content whenever possible.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teft@piefed.social 81 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wowsers. I thought this was gonna be a bullshit meme but it appears to be true. And pretty fucked up.

https://historycollection.com/parisian-prisoners-offered-freedom-agreed-marry-prostitutes-move-mississippi-coast/

Slight correction though, they went to modern day Biloxi, Mississippi which back then was part of the Louisiana territory.

[–] swemg@sh.itjust.works 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

We're not sending the best

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Did we ever send the best to new places?

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 10 months ago

Recently I went to a protest because a spokesperson of the IDF was invited by a Jewish parish. Turns out said spokesperson was a petty criminal here in Germany before he embraced his Jewish heritage to move to Israel. We always send our best to new places.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Australians:

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

“We are, how you say, not zending ze best!”

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

You have to move to Louisiana 🤢

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Increased risk of syphilis?

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Increased by how much? 🤔

[–] EightLeggedFreak@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, if you're shacking up with an illegal prostitute pre-modern-medicine... By my math, a lot.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Was it really, though? You'd think that would curb prostitution a lot. Yet, history is littered with notorious "bohemian bachelors" that lived long lives in the company of prostitutes before acquiring the disease.

Edit: never mind that. In looking up what I thought were examples, it seems I grossly overestimated their lifespans.

[–] EightLeggedFreak@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

They were here for a good time, not a long time.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To my understanding, a lot of earlier French attempts at colonies in North America had fallen apart or seen a significant percentage of colonists killed off by disease and such, so there'd have been a significant risk that you wouldn't survive.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago

“We’ve got a problem over there with disease. How about we send over a bunch of prostitutes.”

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’m guessing nobody asked the prostitutes how they felt about being married to a convicted criminal and sent into exile

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't assume that, because they were in the same offer-you-can't-refuse type of situation as the prisoners. Just like the man's choice was this vs. prison and no future prospects, the woman's choice was also this vs. prison and no future prospects. No reason not to pose it as an offer since 99% will say yes

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I assume the idea is to 1. Get rid of criminals and 2. Populate the new territory.

But wouldn’t you just end up with a new territory populated by criminals? And then have the same problem you originally had?

[–] TheOneAndOnly@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

You should ask Australia.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 5 points 10 months ago

I would guess no one wanted to give up their entire life just to settle in some new land that might as well have been on mars.

And even back then many people knew that if someone had a reasonable place in society then that person would want to continue having a good place in society, because most people only turn to crime when they aren't able to have a decent life otherwise.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

They were probably given a similar deal "marry a prisoner and elope to the new world, or go to jail"

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

While John Law’s bargain to French prisoners might have seemed like a good deal at the time, it is unclear whether or not the prisoners would have preferred to just stay in prison after their ordeal on the Mississippi coast. As far as John Law went he tried desperately to prove that his Louisiana territory was profitable. The bank forged paperwork and printed off paper notes to investors. However, it was eventually discovered that the paper notes being printed and handed to investors exceeded the amount of metal coinage that was held by the bank. Investors rushed to cash in their paper notes in 1720 but the bank was forced to stop payment on paper notes when it became clear they did not have the funds to pay off everyone.

John Law was relieved of his position and forced to flee to Brussels. He later moved to Venice and made a living off of gambling until his death.

Presidential Timber!

[–] sober_monk@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Cajun pride!

[–] Aralakh@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Huh, now that's a different kind of arranged marriage.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 5 points 10 months ago

Damn I did that for free.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Not that Louisiana.
This Louisiana.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

surely nothing can go wrong with that

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I mean . . There’s some . . very attractive people there. That could be a factor.