475
submitted 7 months ago by Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 103 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Boy, if our democracy survives this, I'll bet Minnesota's state-level GOP will be a mess and will need to do a lot of backpedaling. But worse for them: even having seen over the last decade how pathetically short-sighted and amnesic people are politically, I can't foresee Minnesota ever forgiving the GOP nationally in my lifetime. They've burned this bridge badly. Wishful thinking, but I think this is how you create a solid blue state.

[-] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 89 points 7 months ago

We've been a solid blue state since the '70s. And we've only voted Republican 3 times since 1932.

Our GOP is already pathetic and impotent. Our local Democrats (DFL) are already significantly more progressive and effective than the DNC.

But this is adding fuel to the fire in a big way, no doubt.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I wouldn't call Minnesota a "solid blue state" right now by any metric except that both of your US Senators are Democratic.

  • Your Senate is split 34–33 DFL–Republican and the House 65–67 (plus two vacant).
  • Your progressive governor has caved to pressure over a nonsensical scandal not to run again, and despite the fact that he was on the ticket as the VP, the Harris–Walz ticket only beat Trump – an insane fascist – by 50.92–46.68%.
  • Your representatives to the US House are split evenly between Democrats and Republicans.
[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 38 points 7 months ago

Yep. The entire reason Trump and co. are even here is to push the state red by interfering with the election (hence their demands for voter rolls).

[-] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

Those are great numbers to bandy about, but they're different from being here and participating in the local politics.

Like many other blue states and many other places worldwide we're suffering from a resurgence of right wing authoritarianism and political disenfranchisement.

But we're actively fighting it, and winning. And doing far better than most other blue states.

We have a free school lunch program, we have excellent social programs, we have sanctuary status firmly in place for reproductive and trans rights.

Walz stepping back from the Governor seat is local politics inside the DFL. He's been a lightning rod of hatred for our red/purple voters since COVID, and after being party to an honestly embarrassing loss on the national stage seems a good time to transfer power, despite his fantastic successes.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Okay, no, see, that's all nice, and I'm glad you're apparently doing well at a local level and fighting back against far-right authoritarianism. But words have meanings, and the numbers you can pretend all you want aren't relevant don't lie: you're not even approximately a "solid blue state".

  • 2011: Senate 29–37 DFL–Republican; House 61–72
  • 2013: Senate 39–28; House 62–72
  • 2015: Senate 39–28; House 61–73
  • 2017: Senate 32–34–1(V); House 55–75
  • 2019: Senate 30–35–2(I); House 75–55–4(NR)
  • 2021: Senate 31–34–2(I); House 69–59–4(NR)–1(IR)–1(I)
  • 2023: Senate 34–33; House 69–64
  • 2025: Senate 34–33; House 65–67–2(V)

This doesn't even just apply at the state level. For example, Clinton beat Trump by only 1.5% in 2016.

[-] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

Blue State has a generally accepted meaning of 'votes blue in the presidential election'.

Doesn't mean that 100% of our politics is democratic.

Are you arguing this for any particular reason?

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Are you arguing this for any particular reason?

Because I think you completely missed the word "solid" or don't understand what that means in terms of politics (nor do I think you fully understand what "blue state" means, because no, that doesn't just apply to the presidential election, although that is a big part and is heavily correlated).

[-] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works -1 points 7 months ago

What state is bluer, by your measurement?

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

... Is this a joke?

  • California
  • Oregon
  • New Mexico
  • Washington
  • Colorado
  • Illinois
  • Vermont (preempting "but the governor!!" by saying you know you're arguing in bad faith if you think he's not a bizarre exception)
  • New York
  • Massachussetts
  • Rhode Island
  • Connecticut
  • New Jersey
  • Maryland
  • Delaware
  • Hawaii

And some of those like New Mexico I wouldn't even call "solid blue". Dude, you can still be proud of your state and acknowledge reality.

[-] gustofwind@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Funny that NJ is often called a purple state (for a few very good reasons) but the state legislature is basically 2:1 democrat to Republican

I’m not sure how you’re getting downvoted, I think people are just determined to be wrong

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Sometimes when I get upvoted on here (and got upvoted back on Reddit), I feel compelled to ask myself if it's because I've made a cogent point or if it's because I said something that people want to be true authoritatively enough and got lucky with the upvote ratio early on. It's frustrating sometimes, and I don't really know what to do about it.

[-] gustofwind@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I miss forums and such where votes didn’t exist and you simply commented or not

But I do understand how when too many people begin using the thing votes clear up a lot the message boards that would otherwise just be agreement and whatnot

To your point: it’s always a new and random mix of both making a good point and saying what people want to hear. Just gotta not really care

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 19 points 7 months ago

Sound like Washington. Our state GOP is basically just the craziest Trumpers you can imagine. Anyone with anyone even resembling a moderate position has found a home in the conservative wing of the Democrats (which, in fairness, is pretty fucking conservative).

[-] Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

If we were solid blue then the country side would also be voting blue but they don't. Therefore we are a purple state.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago

The “color” of the state doesn’t matter if you’re not intending to hold elections again. Which I absolutely could see them attempting.

[-] zd9@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

if our democracy survives this

I'm not so sure

[-] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It honestly feels like democracy is dead already and that to be trying to get back to what USA may have once been is a bad idea because the foundation is already rotted an corrupted.

Sadly I think people need to stop trying to fix what we had and create something new. And that would probably involve a lot of bloodshed and even then the new creation will already have people trying to infiltrate and corrupt it.

Honestly... Understanding chaos and how to live in it seems like the only truth alive.

[-] huppakee@piefed.social 3 points 7 months ago

trying to fix what we had and create something new

They don't rule each other out, also you'll never ever get a blank page to start with even if you write a constitution and a book of laws all from scratch. But i agree that going back will very likely lead to the situation you have now.

Honestly... Understanding chaos and how to live in it seems like the only truth alive.

On an individual level i think this is the only way, you have to play the cards you're dealt whether you like it or not. But please don't just sit back and take it, you deserve better than that.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 72 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I wouldn't want to try and defend this, either.

[-] Guyonthecouc@lemmy.world 65 points 7 months ago

Has zero chance of winning is the reason. Claiming to have a conscience looks nice on a headline.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

100% this.

Might as well throw in the towel now than spend the next 10 months desperately trying to claw out some kind of position while everyone in the state wants to hang you. There's just more opportunity to get clipped trying to defend the indefensible, meanwhile just sit out the storm and rebrand later has more chances of success.

Republican positions are going to be impossible to defend in that state, and in many other states as well. We need to all see this as a victory no matter what 3 ghosts did or did not visit this chump in the night.

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

He'll let some other chod take the bullet and weasel out of the wood work when things look more favorable after some federal election interference.

[-] Guyonthecouc@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago
[-] Gust@piefed.social 45 points 7 months ago

"Earlier this month, Madel said he helped ICE agent Jonathan Ross with paperwork to get Justice Department legal representation if he is sued or charged with a crime."

What's different about this one, you disingenuous piece of shit?

[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 18 points 7 months ago

She was an unarmed queer woman. Not even remotely part of the Republikkkan tribe.

[-] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 months ago

I appreciate your use of the word queer. I keep wondering why people keep calling her a lesbian. She had a husband before she had a wife, doesn't that make her bisexual?

Conservative "news" keeps calling her a lesbian because it's easier to downplay her death. Their viewers are homophobic so it works on them, but the left should be using the proper terms.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

There’s even less of a flimsy explanation for this one than Renee’s case. It’s absurd to imply she was attempting to run him over, but she was still behind the wheel of something that could kill Ross. Alex never once even put his hand to his gun, and they didn’t even kill him until he was disarmed

[-] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 23 points 7 months ago

“Earlier this month, Madel said he helped ICE agent Jonathan Ross with paperwork to get Justice Department legal representation if he is sued or charged with a crime.”

Really curious what the timeline on this was. I would like to assume it was after, which is still abhorrent and immoral.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In what sense is murdering Americans in their own streets "immigration enforcement"? That phrase itself is propaganda.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

We are absolutely fucking swimming in propaganda in the US, always have been.

A lot of us know it too, it just melts off the brains of anyone who still has one at this point.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

But didn’t drop out of the party. Not in 2016 and not now. That tells me all I need to know.

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Or maybe stay in the race so that whoever gets elected will fight against ICE

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Rats on a sinking ship, nothing more.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This gives me hope, this is the only thing that can stop this momentum, having the middle management of GOP get hollowed out.

This could be the first nail in the coffin. GOP has always been pro rich people but unless your oligarch level rich, you want peace in your streets.

The entire reason why we got here is that neoliberal centrists clutched their pearls at the thought of taxes so kept siding with fascists.

Fascism can only succeed if it fools the liberals before they take total control, looks like they are getting ahead of themselves, probably cause the orange’s shelf life.

[-] FE80@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Get that Somali mayoral candidate to run for gov. Walz announced he isn't running.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The Republicans are gonna find out what revolution means.

[-] LMurch@thelemmy.club 1 points 7 months ago

Didn't Walz drop out earlier too? Do they have any candidates for governor?

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Like 10 others on the Republican side have declared, 1 has on the Democrats side and Amy Klobuchar has filed paperwork, but not declared yet.

Were pre primary so people dropping out doesn't mean a lot unless they are the incumbent like Walz.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

If this all ended tomorrow, by election time people will have forgotten.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You, maybe. Not everyone.

Funny you should say that, though, because the government shutdown ended months ago and I STILL haven't forgiven Schumer and the eight motherfuckers that ended it right when they were starting to get traction. And I kind of suspect I never will. I made a point of remembering their names, and the fact that Jeanne Shaheen of NH made it clear, in those words, that Chuck Schumer was kept notified throughout. When I see their names, I remember.

Similarly, I will always remember the name of Jonathan Ross as cursed, and the names of Renee Good and Alex Pretti as those who were brutally murdered in cold blood by sociopaths cheerfully getting paid to play The Most Dangerous Game (it's a very old movie ref) for the crime of caring about their fellow Minnesotans.

You can change my mind, or try, but I've kept powerful grudges for far less. I don't carry many, I'd rather forgive where I can, but these infamies will never die for me until they have been fully addressed to my own satisfaction, and that's a line that I draw for myself. You don't get to draw it for me. No one does.

And I'm not alone. Lines have been crossed now that have never been crossed before.

Not all of us have the memory of gerbils.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Most do otherwise we wouldn’t be so fucked.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
475 points (99.6% liked)

News

39162 readers
2280 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS