this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
300 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30574 readers
2344 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you think congress may have forgotten how their job works? Like I remember learning the importance of congress in middle school. Power of purse and all that. Why is the congress petitioning the president for legislation? Can we please replace the congressmen who don't understand what their job description is? Every day in the news its just "Legislator asking someone else to do their job" "Legislature confused on how laws are made" "legislator claiming the presidents office is just better at making laws"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The most interesting part of this is the timing. 11 months since the trump admin did the largest pump and dump in human history during the great tariff terror of 2025. I was there watching markets drop 5-7% a day for a week. I was there when my accounts got major margin calls at the low. I was there when trump tweeted on truth social and the markets rose 20% in one day and almost 100% over the next 6 months.

So I know a $200 Billion capital gains tax relief package when I see it! More tax cuts for the rich. Congress has no hopes of passing it so they are hoping the president can wave his magic wand and cough up $200B

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't enough that they stole all your money and manipulated markets, they need a tax break on all the money they stole!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

200 billion is peanuts to the tens of trillions the neoliberal-conservative cancer has been stealing from the working class for the last 50 years. They won't stop until they rule all life on Earth, or kill all life on Earth.

Late stage capitalism is fascism, and the fact that Luigi was an anomaly — even after our governments and intelligence agencies are proven to be run by criminally corrupt pedophiles — proves how mentally ill our entire civilization truly is. We are little more than talking apes, and we prove it every single day.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I think they’re probably going to throw us in the wood chipper soon

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

But 200 billion is a lot of money for a single handout aimed at .01% of the population 😅

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I blame those who protect them. Police, military etc

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago (6 children)

URL
archive[.]today
archive[.]fo
archive[.]is
archive[.]li
archive[.]md
archive[.]ph
archive[.]vn
archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd[.]onion

Source


The operator of the archive service you're using has edited archived content and used its CAPTCHA page to DDoS a blog.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Also important to note that the operator of that site has been editing archived pages, so who the fuck knows if anything still matches the original.

But yes, the malicious hijacking of people's browser to launch a DDoS attack is worse.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Sorry! Happy to correct. Can someone lend me a clean url?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think we maybe need to force these idiots watch School House Rock again.

Maybe their voters, too.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

RIGHT! I forgot about that. We learned this shit when we were toddlers. 😭 this is preschool level political science they are failing. Clearly a sign of dementia.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The plan pushed by Cruz and Scott has been sought by conservatives for many years. Under current law, an investor who bought $100 worth of stock in 1990 and sold it today for $300 would currently owe capital gains taxes on the full $200 in profit. But the $100 investment in 1990 would be worth roughly $230 in today’s dollars after accounting for inflation. Under the Cruz-Scott proposal, the investor would only owe taxes on that $70, rather than the full $200. That is why the proposal is known as “indexing capital gains for inflation.”

Ah, so the ultra-wealthy who have been holding during the longest bull market in history can get a massive discount for dumping on us peons?

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Yes, and remember only about 40% of the country had stocks, and most of them are in the hands of 10%. So grandma might get a lil tax break and bezos gets a big one.

They are kind of stuck in a paradox though because they are causing so much fucking inflation that the stock market is really the only place to keep money. Idk where they’re going to stick cash from selling stocks. Could be a market crash on the horizon a planned one.

I really don’t think these guys want off the inflated asset train so I’m kinda more suspicious on this particular handout

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Legislated bag holding for all your retirement needs

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

But that is the purpose of investment. To not lose money to inflation. He wants to make extra gains out of his ass

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can we please replace the congressmen who don't understand what their job description is?

I always wonder whether people who talk like this are employing ineffective rhetoric or if they genuinely believe Ted Cruz just doesn't know Congress holds the power of the purse. He understands what his job description is. They all do. You're the one playing the wrong game. They want authoritarianism, they want to concentrate power, they want to destroy democracy, they want you to suffer, they want people to die. This isn't hyperbole, they're just evil. Stop whitewashing what they believe and call them out for the demons they are. Ted Cruz wants the President to have unchecked power. He wants Trump to cut hundreds of billions of dollars from taxes without Congress. He wants it to be easier to do bad things and harder to do good things. We cannot afford to be this fucking smug about the people putting us in camps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Ancient Rome before the fall of the Republic is eerily similar. Only difference is, we don't have Caesar and Pompey. We instead have a chuckle Fuck who rapes children and is the single dumbest person alive.

[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago

Ted “my dad isn’t the zodiac” Cruz

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

We do love recreating classic movies

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I do not like that man Ted Cruz,
I do not like his far-right views.
I do not like his stupid chin,
I do not like his smarmy grin.
I do not like him with a beard,
I do not like him freshly sheared.
I do not like Ted Cruz at all,
That man Ted Cruz can suck my balls.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I don't like Ted Cruz, yet I will allow him to do an intimate sexual act with my delicate testicles

🤨

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago
[–] PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Someone should just give dude the biggest wedgie possible. Fucking loser.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Please Texas for the love of god get rid of this man! There's gotta be another unqualified jerk off they can agree on right?

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The senators also frame the proposal as a potential solution to the nation’s housing market, arguing that many homeowners are choosing to stay in their properties rather than sell and face a steep capital gains bill.

If the sale results in less than $250k in profit it's already tax free. It goes up to $500k for joint filers. This doesn't help the average person, just like eliminating the inheritance tax wouldn't help us either.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yea that's a tax break that does help the "middle class" even tho home ownership is being denied to more and more of them. They need to raise the standard deduction to the median wage and make the rich people shoulder the tax burden created. I'd bet they'd be more frugal if they weren't finding new ways to tax the poor to cover the spending.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What does congress even do anymore?

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Collect free health care and a big paycheck that most Americans will never see. Sometimes they deregulate companies and invest in there stocks creating massive wealth. They manufacture consent for war, eat hot chip and lie basically

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

index capital gains to inflation

is a ridiculous idea, but one that should be shot down in congress.

Far more revenue would be generated for society if there was no capital gains tax advantage at all instead of giving another huge advantage to investor class. This is a better idea than wealth taxes. To avoid the double taxation argument, allowing corporations to deduct dividend payments would still raise extreme revenue, with dividend income taxed the same as other income. It would also improve dynamic capital allocation as more funds flowing to investor class would permit them to support newer, more promising, investments.

Corporatist supremacy oppresses the investor class. This tax change would mean less dividends paid because it would be an even greater tax advantage to boost corporate share prices instead of ever paying back investors

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That is a good idea. Probably too nuanced for a main stream campaign but something a senate committee could at least work on. The incentives to form monopolies and perform buybacks has really stopped a lot of progress and entrenched the wealth inequality. CEO's paid in stock options to avoid taxes, there's a lot of ways you can hammer the money out without Main Street noticing.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

something a senate committee could at least work on

Seems improbable if one side is considering how to reduce taxes for their donors, and other side is looking at fair taxation policies. I'm not sure that such committees can be formed if minority is pessimistic on agenda for it.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

highly improbable but still a good idea.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago

Do you think congress may have forgotten how their job works?

Cruz knows. He's just sucking up to Trump and doing all he can to further enable dictatorship.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They might have been able to do it but Noem blew it all on personal advertising.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

She spent $200 Million I think, so only 0.1% of the amount of hand outs but ya.... that's the point, 200M here 20B there 200B over there, 4T over 10 years, every fucking day they are making entire banks worth of money disappear.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

I've given up following "numbers" years ago. It's the state of decline that I now look for. This avoids the whole "can't see the forest for the trees" scenario. I agree with you though.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Do American care about another few hundred billion in debt? The interest on past debt is a trillion dollars, Biden proposed a 4T Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which the interest on that would be more than 200b.

Every politician takes on more debt than the last, so I assumed Americans don't care about debt loads.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Spending 1.2 Trillion fixing roads, airports and ports? Thats like literally the purpose of forming a government. Im not sure where you got the 4T from. That was the tax deficit spending included in the BBB 2025.

Yes we spend 900 billion a year on interest so where are we coming up with 200B for hand outs?

Yes the people keep voting morons into congress and have set up perverse incentives for them to rob us. Yes it still makes me upset every time.

So yes some of us Americans do care about the congress being able to pass a sensible budget. The debt won't stop growing if they don't stop giving everyone handouts. I deeply care that the next 3 generations will still be paying for the Iraq War and Bush Tax cuts, now they get Iran and trump tax cuts.

No I have no idea how to stop the insanity.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You really don't see the difference between this and Biden's infrastructure bill?

Are you for real?

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I do, I just see a lot of debt either way. Surely if you wanted balanced budgets at least one party would support them.

load more comments
view more: next ›