1017
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 230 points 5 months ago

Literally every type of age verification ever put into place has been circumvented by children. EVERY SINGLE ONE.

[-] Watermark710@piefed.social 99 points 5 months ago

When I was little, my mom used to send me to the store with a note that said to sell me cigarettes, and that they were for her. When I started smoking, I used to reuse the notes to get my own smokes. I got my first fake ID at 13 so I could buy beer.

[-] i078@europe.pub 65 points 5 months ago

When I was 13 I could just buy beer, the trick was to make it look like you are helping your parents with groceries. So also pickup stuff like a carton of eggs, potatoes and milk. I never had any issue, but it was a different time and in Europe

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 months ago

Yeah, that last bit is key.

In German I think we were drinking in the clubs at that age. No “helping the parents with the eggs and milk” lol

[-] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 10 points 5 months ago

My mum did the same thing she stopped when I used the £20 note to buy sweets, that was a lot of sweets back then.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 10 points 5 months ago

I guess its a good thing that the point if this is just to tie a real human to their online presence and protecting kids never actually mattered.

You know, for a given value of "good" being "actually very very bad".

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 209 points 5 months ago

Age verification bypass tool soon to be made illegal:

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago
[-] StillAlive@piefed.world 26 points 5 months ago

John Oliver

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 5 months ago

It’s simply impossible to tell.

[-] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well, obviously an adult, but I admit I'm a little unsure about which one. Hope that helps.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 132 points 5 months ago

Yeah, because it isn't about that. They don't give a fuck about kids seeing porn. Even when there are age checks, there will be plenty of free porn.

It's all about being able to connect an online post with the author.

[-] pwxd@lemmy.zip 34 points 5 months ago

They're doing this age verification on purpose just to spy on adults lol

[-] Solventbubbles@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Don't forget that they are also doing this to desensitize and normalize this for children...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Yeah, and get ready for those big platforms selectively leaking user data, sometimes with falsified stuff. Get ready for union leaders suddenly being outed for being into weird shit (often literally), all while they're clueless and disgusted, as part of online smear campaigns. Always said that "cancel culture"/purity testing is a dangerous weapon that can be astroturfed by the enemy, and there's already some precedent for that (most recently the whole Hasan dog thing). Even some leftists are trying really hard to cancel some "annoying" people among them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 84 points 5 months ago

I can’t wait to email this to my MP

Canada Bill S209 needs to die. It’s bad legislation.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Fuck, didn’t realize this cancer had reached Canada

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 64 points 5 months ago

I'm in my mid thirties and I'd still buy a mask or something to trick these systems if and when this becomes a thing in my country.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

Guy Fawkes uses a lot of online services.

[-] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

Same I have absolutly no respect for big tech

[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 61 points 5 months ago

As someone who spent my formative days figuring out how to bypass early digital locks my school was putting in place to "protect us" ... The system loses this game. Every time. You are taking kids with nothing but time, no apparent drawbacks, and everything to gain... And placing them against "good enough" implemented by people who could give two shits about it.

This will continue to lose until they twist the knobs too tight and hit false positive central... And oops now the populace hates it. Control for thee is fine until its for me.

Tale as old as technology itself.

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 5 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 50 points 5 months ago
[-] yoshisaur@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 5 months ago

I went to the stock market today and did a business

[-] Insekticus@aussie.zone 15 points 5 months ago

I wonder how the business industry is going these days?

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago

People act as if it was a bug and not a feature. This was intended. After people sufficiently make fun of the current solution that everyone knows how easily it is broken, the next step is requiring both ID and face scan and comparing photo on ID with face scan. Congrats, privacy is removed completely. Every poster is now tied with real life identity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 months ago

We should get all of our advice from little kids. They have not yet been bound by knowing what is or isn't possible. The meek shall inherit the earth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Today in: "Just let the parents parent."

It's good to see a reminder that depending on the majority of parents to act in absence of real, tangible regulation is doomed to be a failure.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago
[-] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 17 points 5 months ago

I couldn't stop laughing when one of my kids showed me a picture of his 10 year old friend's effort with the texta. We are talking comical magician curly moustache. Roblox verified that account as 18 though and now that account can't talk to his school friends.

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 5 months ago

He outsmarted himself lol

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 16 points 5 months ago

Good, good -- teach the children that authority is bullshit. This kind of thing is more effective than book learnin'.

[-] violentfart@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Is it legal to “verify” my age to be a minor? Would less of my information be collected?

…not that any of it is accurate anyway.

[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 12 points 5 months ago

Blame to all who made such stupid software and then called it "age check"

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 21 points 5 months ago

It's not age check. It's 1984-style government invasion of privacy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Oh no. All that's left now that the age veifications are bypassed are the extensive public surveillance. Better leave that running.

[-] wuffah@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

We want your children to be safer online so we forced them to self-identify with biometric data? Isn’t that part of what caused this in the first place?

Privacy, security, and regulation is the answer here, not more surveillance capitalism. But that’s anathema to the business models of every social media company so instead we get this ham-fisted attempt at jamming the square peg of “digital advertising surveillance” into the round hole of “protecting children”. The mechanical action damages everything involved.

This system is specifically and very effectively designed to monitor, analyze, addict, and sell people, and this “solution” just ends up being more engineering to that end. Asking it to selectively age-gate content is like inventing a global network for information transfer and then becoming outraged when it’s used for file sharing. Copy is an intrinsic operation of digital data, and exploitation is an intrinsic operation of social media. We’re asking it to do the opposite of what it’s created to do.

Parents should be in charge of filtering content for their children, and the government should be in charge of using the collective power of the people to regulate companies that exploit them instead of serving them. Asking social media companies to do it is backing the wolf truck up to the chicken coop while the guy hired to protect the chickens tells you “The wolves will protect the chickens from other predators!”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 5 months ago

What year were you born on January 1st?

[-] posturemaxxing@lemmy.wtf 9 points 5 months ago

the SOY gmod method vs the CHAD fake mustache

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago

I guess now we must ban pens and markers because children might draw fake mustaches and bypass age verification.

So long humble pen. We will miss you.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
1017 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

88571 readers
5267 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS