“This code is too dangerous for me to look at, so it must be fine.”

I keep thinking about that scene in the original Star Trek where they distract the computer by having it calculate the final digit of pi. If the Enterprise had AI like ours, the computer probably would have just said four.

My sick grandmother always loved running this curl command

Automated code scanners can’t be so dumb that this worlds, can they?

This is the dumbest fucking timeline.

I admire the simple brilliance of this.

Jokes aside, could you protect your blog / git repo this way?

People: but censorship is your friend! Think about children! "Safety refusals" make them stupid enough to believe in government and justice!

LLM-based code scanning is a joke. It flags the D standard library and runtime as a North Korean malware.

The field of "AI safety" has to be populated with some of the dumbest people to touch a computer.

But I didn't think they would be this dumb.

The AI boosters managed to make AI dangerous in a real life by pretending to be afraid of scenarios that were only fictional.

Like how you can panic guards in Hitman so they don't notice you trespassing.

Not to give them ideas, but couldn't they just start flagging files that fail to pass the LLM lol?

Aside from "violent" and "criminal" prompts, is there anything an LLM can refuse that would otherwise be common?

Of course these dipshit systems aren't fail-safe. Of course they aren't. FFS...

imagine someone actually assembling a nuclear or biological weapon based off LLM responses, like they can't even get a simple fucking web search right most of the time, and you wanna put together deadly materials based on that shit??