this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
527 points (91.9% liked)

People Twitter

10247 readers
1941 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Klear@piefed.world 140 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is an ad. You're posting advertisement.

[–] HuePony@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That ad makes me to never buy their product

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah it’s exposing a shitty chatbot prompt if anything. Easy pass.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works -3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ahh paid shill posting to the account? Publishing intern on the spectrum?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 weeks ago

Why would a "paid shill" post on an official account? That's not what a shill is

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yes, but an AI slop ad that went hilariously wrong.

Seriously, are you thinking about reading some Archie comics now because of this? Or do you have a sliver of agency in your own life?

Edit: I'm not calling the post AI slop, I'm saying this is obviously a chatbot-managed account that was accidentally too honest, which makes it funny.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

And did chatbots use twitter back then?

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

Chatbots before the LLM revolution were simple scripts with placeholders. They could not go rogue.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 weeks ago

Not like this, no

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Chatbots sent emails in 2002. I vaguely remember spam

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

They can try to keep me out of Riverdale, the punks. I'll get Jughead one of these days.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you may find yourself in a beautiful house, with a beautiful wife And you may ask yourself, "Well, how did I get here?"

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Same as it ever was, same as it ever was.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Doug@piefed.social 25 points 1 month ago

But doctor, I am Archie Comics.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I bought an Archie comic recently and it was bitter and sad.

Like entire comics about how older bands were better and kids are wrong kind of thing.

I genuinely think that’s still how the writers see the world and it’s not just a tweet.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man if you think that's bitter and sad then you should check out Riverdale

[–] riot@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone whose girlfriend watched the Riverdale show and talked a lot about the story lines and characters, I cannot advise enough against checking it out. Unless you enjoy train wrecks. Then you should absolutely check it out.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Of course I enjoy train wrecks. That's why I play Derail Valley. Oh, you don't mean literal train wrecks, do you?

[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 4 weeks ago

I kind of appreciate the honesty at least?

[–] AzuranAurora@piefed.ca 21 points 1 month ago

Silence, brand.

[–] Bohne93@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago

Bro threw in a bleak take on reality

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 14 points 1 month ago

BRANDS DO NOT BELONG ON SOCIAL MEDIA

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Thank fuck lots of my friends are childfree like us, and most of the others still make room for having a life outside of kids.

My parents made the super smart move to move to a future proof house.

I grew up in SO many different neighborhoods, it doesn't matter at all.

And I'm not getting old damnit!

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A bunch of my friends had kids and now they only hang out with other parents.

We’re not like asking to go clubbing, but our D&D group died off. We used to do online gaming but it’d impossible to schedule with parents. Stuff like that.

And I mean, life happens, it’s okay, I don’t mind hanging out with their kids around. I just want a bit more of their slice of the life pie, but it’s hard to compete with hanging out while someone else’s kids entertain your kids.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 8 points 1 month ago

This is a temporary period, kids can start entertaining themselves more usually by 7 or 8 years old, and they can start doing all day or overnight play dates, which frees up a lot of time for parents to reengage

[–] Beth@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

Yes ….but your coworkers will probably come to you and ask you about things like fax machines. 🥲

[–] FunStuffIsFun@eviltoast.org 9 points 4 weeks ago

Silence brand

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I am infertile and thus incapable of having children

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Excuse me, you may possess as many children as you can find and run away with

Fertility got shit to do with that, it's all about legs.