this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
578 points (99.0% liked)

News

38524 readers
2052 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“When losses happen, somebody’s got to pay for it.”

Called Freedom Fuel Network, the enterprise encompasses dozens of gas stations throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey, USA Today reported, although it isn’t exactly clear which locations are open for business. Plastered in American flag decals and “Freedom Fuel” branding, the gas stations seem to be selling unleaded gasoline for the fixed-price of $3.47 per gallon, about 32 cents cheaper than the current average price in the US.

According to GasBuddy, nearby prices range from $3.85 to as much as $4.49 — no doubt reflecting the slower drip of oil from the president’s costly war on Iran, which burst back into active fighting this week.

As head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy Patrick De Haan told the Philadelphia Inquirer, the current price of crude oil means there’s no way Freedom Fuel’s $3.47 price point can turn a profit.

“Stations selling at this price, it’s not sustainable,” De Haan explained. “Generally, when losses happen, somebody’s got to pay for it.”

De Haan raises an obvious question: who is paying for it? If the stations are losing money on every gallon, somebody has to make up the difference somewhere — whether out of Trump’s pocket, that of a friendly donor, or the taxpayer’s. And if it’s a private company taking the hit, how long until they stop subsidizing Pennsylvania drivers?

Already, the stunt seems to be distorting local markets. As of Wednesday, a nearby Sam’s Club in Dresher dropped its price to match the $3.47 figure — surely good news for anybody buying gas in South Eastern Pennsylvania, but as always, the devil is in the details.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JollyG@lemmy.world 377 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Come join the anticommunist Republican party. They've got:

  1. Price controls
  2. Closed markets
  3. State-owned industry

Edit adding a 4th

  1. The living-or-dead status of party members as closely guarded state secrets
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 91 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

All my libertarian friends hate it, but somehow keep voting for it.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

What else would they do?

Vote for a democrat?

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

I’m hoping they keep their asses at home…

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Libertarians are just conservatives + weed - religion. They claim to not be cons but still vote 100% in that direction

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Libertarians are just insanely stupid people who wish to appear intelligent. Because they think those views make them seem intelligent, lol

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago

Libertarianism is not a real ideology. Its just three raccoons in a trench coat. Anarcho-capitalism is a contradiction in terms.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's owned by Trump not the state. Closer to authoritarian dictatorship than communism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] credo@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Silly person, that’s not what communist means. It means “anything/anyone we don’t like.”

It’s more of an amorphous ideal than a concrete set of “rules”.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] allen@rail.chat 112 points 2 weeks ago

@cannedtuna Let me get this straight...

City-run grocery stores selling at-cost: Communist Bread Lines

Gas stations with government-controlled gas prices: Freedom Fuel Network

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He's draining our reserves. God we're fucked.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think we all know by now collapse is inevitable

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 78 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When the (Venezuelan) oil is stolen and the wars are paid for by the taxpayers, everything is profit.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 48 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Forgot about this oil reserve, I was thinking he’s laundering Russian oil

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've been waiting for it to crop up. Right after the illegal attack on Venezuela, Trump bragged about personally having a tanker of oil that no one ended up wanting. We had a stable oil supply. Then not too long after that, the attacks on Iran started. I have no idea if it's anything in the grand scheme of grifting and cons and murder but I'm guessing it was a factor in some way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 67 points 2 weeks ago

The Gang Solves the Gas Crisis

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 57 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is ILLEGAL to Undercut the Competition!

-Free Market Republicans!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He paid a bunch of existing gas stations to change their name and lower their prices. He will make up the difference by subsidizing the gas stations using tax payer money. I guarantee you this will not be noticed by the majority.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is all you need to know.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

This is like something out of a third world country. "Here is some cheap gas so keep supporting me."

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is like something out of a third world country.

In many important ways, the U.S. already is. Especially in certain parts of the country.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I want to know the quality of the fuel. I'm betting there's a significant amount of water and other contaminants in it.

[–] numbermess@fedia.io 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago

The usual Trump quality: Starts at rock bottom and somehow manage to dig down.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s going to turn out that he is waiving the federal gas tax for some buddies and a cut.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be convenient if this "private retailer" somehow got free access to US fuel reserves?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago

"Out of Trump's pocket" LMAO whatever they're on, I'd like to have some.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

what happens when your cheap gas is no longer available but all the competitors already dried up?

[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If it's 25% cheaper, it's probably 40% water.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Government subsidized gas is not an issue. But that's not what's going on. Trump is pocketing the money, cutting the gas with something else, selling stolen gas, or using tax payer funds for it (the last of which is whatever), but whatever he is doing isn't being done out of the goodness of his heart.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Considering they already lifted regulations on percentage of ethanol added I can only assume this is %15 gas lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I keep seeing claims that Trump is doing this, but I have not seen anyone make any actual assertions of an evidence to that effect.

While Trump has jumped on the promotion, and I wouldn't be surprised if he's in on it somehow, it really sounds to me like some MAGA asshat who's trying to take advantage for publicity.

I'd really like to know who's paying for it, though, and why. Maybe it's just an introductory price to convince people they'll sell it for less, but I don't see how that'll get long-term customers.

Either way, the wild claims with nothing to back them up (i.e. OP's title) really annoy me. There's so much to be angry at. Fabricating lies is not needed. Or certainly saying things that are not known to be true - even the article doesn't say Trump is doing this, just the submitted title.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I keep seeing claims that Trump is doing this, but I have not seen anyone make any actual assertions of an evidence to that effect.

You can always tell when someone doesn’t read the article, sees the headline, and jumps straight into the comments because it’s literally right there in both the article and the short version.

USA Today reported:

At the beginning of the article referenced:

The White House launched 25 Freedom Fuel gas stations, all selling fuel at $3.47 a gallon.

The White House announced the initiative on July 7 on X with a video of customers thanking President Donald Trump for lowering gas prices. The gas stations are located in the greater Philadelphia area, the White House told USA TODAY in an email on Tuesday, July 7.

I mean, did Trump come up with this idea? Very unlikely. I mean we all know how he operates at this point. Someone approaches him with an idea or product, and all Trump does is slap his name on it, ie: Trump Steaks, Trump Mobile, etc. and then he collects the royalties or kickbacks or whatever.

Either way, the wild claims with nothing to back them up

Again, you clearly didn’t read the article

i.e. OP's title

Not my title, the community rules state:

  1. Post titles should be the same as the article used as the source. Posts which titles don't match the source may be removed.

even the article doesn't say Trump is doing this, just the submitted title.

It’s in the actual article, not the TL;DR version for brevity because people don’t read full articles.

In a July 1st post on Trump’s social media platform Truth Social, the president praised a “VERY smart Retailer” for “stepping up,” and “lowering gas prices at 25 ‘FREEDOM FUEL’ Stations across the Greater Philadelphia Area.”

“This Retailer is taking the lead, and others should follow,” Trump lauded. “They are doing this because they love the USA.”

What, do you expect him to run it personally or something? It’s directly posted on the whitehouse.gov site. While everyone out here is using him to make money, if it’s on the .gov website it doesn’t really matter who came up with the idea, he stamped it, and had it put up on a government official site. If you want a list of where these actually are, they’re available on the Freedom Fuel website. Feel free to go drive out to them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago

They will use up everything they can. And when they lose blame everything on Democrats.

If they win, they don't care about people complaining.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump Freedom Fuel now with more high fructose syrup.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok here's my supposition:

The summary is: wealthy donor(s) are covering the loss so Trump doesn't lose the midterms.

The longer version is: most fuel consumed in the US is produced domestically. There no "shortage" because of the Iran situation, but prices increase because there's no alternative putting downward pressure on prices.

Suppose some domestic producer decided that the cost to them of trump being impeached is greater than the profit foregone by selling fuel at less than market rates.

Or, suppose Trump said to local producers, if you keep me in office we will keep this Iran thing going indefinitely, so process are down when he needs them to be but can go back up after an election.

No matter how you slice it, seems like a recipe for hyper wealth concentration.

[–] hcf@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

US is a net exporter of refined fuels (what you put in your car), but the US doesn't produce the heavy crude that its refineries are all set up to convert into that fuel.

It's like saying you produce more cakes than you consume. That doesn't really mean shit when you run out of sugar, bomb the supermarket, mine the roads between you and the supermarket, and burn all the bridges between you and your neighbors. Can't exactly "borrow a cup of sugar" your way out of this one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

My first thought at first headline was "now I'm outright paying for these motherfuckers' gas too?"

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I gotta say, I thought the economy was way more fragile and would have no chance to withstand this concerted effort to bring it down. I mean it will 💯 go down in biblical flames, I'm just amazed it took so long!

I think the people who are trying to make it happen are surprised to. Doesn't matter to them because they will end up owning the planet anyway, but still!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 16 points 2 weeks ago

Trump is going to go down in history as the most successful career criminal ever.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

https://www.jalopnik.com/2210988/donald-trump-giving-communism-try-government-approved/

When I first heard this story, the article gave me a laugh.

Communism is when gas prices low.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't trust this fuel to start a forest fire, let alone fuel a car.

[–] usernameunnecessary@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

You can't make this up

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 14 points 2 weeks ago

Willing to wager these gasoline inventories are getting diluted well beyond our normal summer blend thresholds.

load more comments
view more: next ›