this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
397 points (99.5% liked)

News

38524 readers
2085 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. grocery slowdown is becoming harder to ignore.

Shoppers are buying fewer items than a year ago, and grocery sales are declining as weakening unit sales are now outweighing rising prices. That is according to new analysis from Bain & Company using NielsenIQ grocery data shared exclusively with CNBC.

Grocery units, which refer to individual items or products sold, fell 1.8% in June from a year earlier, a sharp reversal from the 0.1% year-over-year growth recorded in June 2025. While prices continue to rise about 2% to 3% year-over-year, that inflation cushion for the industry is no longer enough to keep overall sales growing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 235 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Food is famously a luxury good so it makes sense people would pull back in order to spend their money on necessities like bombs to drop on foreign elementary schools and shit

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

Don't forget to save for some children's hospital bombs too

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm trying to limit my avocado toasts to just 3 times a week.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

Whoa, moneybags over here just casually mentioning they eat a whole avocado and also get three square pieces of bread every week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I haven't eaten for three weeks so I can donate more bombs as a patriotic act. I'm doing my part!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I use mine to buy necessities like gasoline to make molotov cocktails out of the empty bottles I collect from the trash.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 142 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I like the headline:
"It's a problem for the food companies that the customer don't have money"

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 12 points 1 week ago

They should be patient and wait for it to trickle down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 113 points 1 week ago (2 children)

this should be the true economic indicator, not the fucking DOW. idc if the DOW is fifty million, if people cant afford food we have a major fucking problem.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

DJIA is not an economic indicator. The index highlights half of the relation between Industrials and Transports (DJTA). The S&P 500 is closer to an economic indicator but still not really. The Dow is usually referenced as a distraction from real indicators like the Capitalization to GDP ratio (aka Buffett Indicator). If one looks at the real indicators, we've been in some real economy ending doom for quite a while now.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago

But Pam Bondi said that all that matters is that the Dow is at 50k, not these Epstein files!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 71 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Companies should have thought of the repercussions before shoveling cash into fascism.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 week ago

When your entire focus is one fiscal quarter long, you never think of the long term repercussions of your choices.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would someone please think of the companies!?

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pressure on food companies? Loads of people not being able to afford much food seems like maybe those people are under some pressure too, and maybe that's the more important part?

[–] modus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but are you considering the shareholders?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Remember, companies are people. The GOP knows they are the most important people and are far more important than the people who are people.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd buy a lot more food if my job paid me more. Instead, rice and beans baby. Maybe a splurge on champagne every time a key republican dies, but that's it.

[–] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Rice and beans are pretty good though, especially if you add in a little salsa or some grape tomatoes and a sprinkle of shredded cheese.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's becoming harder to ignore the prices are higher and quality is worse than ever

[–] enkonju@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey, don't forget about quantity! Cereal boxes are so thin that they can't stand up on their own anymore, old recipes don't work anymore because cans are too small, and pretty much every non-food item has gotten 25% smaller or more.

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The cereal boxes are just awful I was stocking grocery for a while and you had to rely on tricks of physics to get those boxes fully stocked on the shelf lol. Just more proof they don't think about anyone down the line when they design stuff anymore

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (4 children)

All I know is, I'm 43, when I was a kid in the 90s we'd go grocery shopping and have an overflowing cart that was around $100. Now, the same cart $100 isn't enough to cover the wire mesh at the bottom of the cart. It's absolutely insane. I bet it would be $400 to fill the cart. That's not inflation thats a scam.

It is absolutely a scam. Remember the egg shortage? Eggs were going for $7+ a dozen in SoCal and a few miles across the border the prices had only risen slightly to maybe $2.50/dozen.

And now there's this:

Egg producers will pay $3.3M and donate 53 million eggs to settle price fixing claims

Forcing U.S. egg producers to pay a minuscule 0.37% fine on $1.22 billion in excess profits sends an unmistakable message to businesses everywhere. With Trump in charge they can fleece Americans without the slightest fear of consequences and they are doing just that.

[–] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago

I genuinely don't know how families are doing it. I spend as much on food as a single person as my parents did with a family in the early 2000s. Granted, we didn't eat much, but we didn't starve, and I don't eat much either. I rarely eat meat, I don't go to restaurants, and maybe once every month or two I'll "treat" myself to a gas station meal or a bagel sandwich from a coffee shop. I'm so glad I don't have children to try to feed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 week ago

That's OK, they'll just raise prices more to make up for the falling consumption! /s

Remember, the only two nations to vote against food -- FOOD being a human right at the UN a few years ago were... the USA and Israel.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

We have scaled back significantly on our grocery purchases within the past month. No snacks, only stuff that's on sale, beef products very rarely (because it's fucking expensive now) and fewer items overall. Even after all that it comes to around $80 per trip. But we are now losing money due to our power and water bills getting jacked up so we are looking into cutting back even more.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This is because of all the people who just got kicked off food stamps because of the big beautiful bill

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Probably has a lot to do with it. A friend says his retired, low income parents had their SNAP benefits cut from $300 / month to $30.

Well I'm sure that has a lot to do with it, I would expect it's simply also just due to the massively inflated prices of many foods and the massively increasing costs of other standard expenses like rent

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Won't someone think of the shareholders???

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Have they tried paying people more?

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Sorry, no...Best we can do is charge you more for groceries, gas, and basic necessities.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

There will literally pay private armies to start killing us before they would pay us a dollar more per hour.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago

People can't afford to buy food? Please think about poor Nestlé, they might make slightly less profit this year.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Probably doesn't help that some of the food can give you weeks long explosive diarrhea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Shoppers are buying fewer items than a year ago, and grocery sales are declining as weakening unit sales are now outweighing rising prices.

You maximize profit by raising prices until the units sold fall to the point where prices * units falls below the peak. The peak is where profit is maximized. It seems they've reached it. For the next little while they'll keep on cutting costs to grow profits. Recipe reformulations with fewer and cheaper ingredients, cheaper substitutions, more soy and water in the sausages, and other general quality reductions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rozodru@piefed.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I suck at math but even I know that stagnation of wages + increase in cost of rent + increase in cost of food = bad times.

Wages continue to stagnate or people are being laid off left right and center and these knuckleheads are all shocked pikachu face that no one is buying while continuing to raise prices?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 1egg4u@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In Canada we are spending like 120% of our income on groceries and it isnt just the inflation but the compounding shrinkflation with climate crisis causing inclement weather that means crop insecurity...

It aint looking good and at this point companies are going to have to realize they cant profit if nobody has any money to spend

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fuck anyone who makes millions off of basic human rights

[ drops SM-58 mic ]

[ the floor breaks ]

load more comments (1 replies)

Pressure to bring prices down right? Less demand means lower prices right? The free market is a lie

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

These grocery stores have been locking up a lot of items as well further shooting themselves in the foot because they refuse to look long term.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

You mean those same food companies that literally were found guilty of price fixing and then got a slap on the wrist, which was the best that we could do under the law, for manufacturing scarcity and screwing Americans over?

Pressure on those food companies?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's one way to solve the obesity epidemic...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Starting to think if prices go up ozempic starts to become cost effective

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

If prices keep going up you probably won't need ozempic.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

The same greedy bastard would charge us for oxygen if they could. I am middle of the middle class and my grocery shopping has changed dramatically thanks to the shareholders and executives making life more difficult.

load more comments
view more: next ›