this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
316 points (98.8% liked)

Political Humor

2080 readers
12 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

stolen from *eddit

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Distorted_Signal@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

I don't see why this was posted as a joke. We're in post-Joke times.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Andy Beshesr is a failure. He could have pressed the issue but he wrote a letter and refused to be persistent.

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

King of the Kentucky Cucks

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yup, and his performative nonsense is going to make sure he gets to stay in the presidential race. Fucking sickening.

I wonder what they have on these governors. This comes on the heels of Colorado's governor just letting a literal traitor get off scot-free.

[–] core@leminal.space 4 points 2 days ago

They all work for the same people, theyre on the same team. No dirt is needed b/c its being done voluntarily

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Mitch surviving, or faking being alive, until 12:01 a.m. to run out the clock as one last FU to democracy would be extremely on brand.

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Going out doing what he loved, fucking democracy raw dog

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Obstructionist to the end.

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Isn't this the same shit he pulled on Obama with the supreme Court nominations? While also violating it even a dem appointed one died

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is just a fact.

If the Democrats weren't cowards they would do something about it.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

They are not cowards. They are complicit.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If Americans werent lazy cowards this wouldnt be a problem to begin with.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If the whole world would stop trading with the lazy coward's dollar it wouldn't be such a big problem, now would it? You should be able to make it on your own without lazy coward money and finance!

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

This is the truth. If the dollar weren’t propping up everything and the world economy diversified, the US would quickly become part of the third world.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

The world has become absurd. When will Bizarro save us? If I watched a fictional movie containing what has happened in the last few years I'd quit half way through in disgust (as that would never happen in real life).

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

And they're going to get away with it.

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i dont understand why there are deadlines for things like this that you can plan around and easily game in the government. like, what's keeping them from having an election at any time anyway?

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 7 points 3 days ago

Logistical concerns based on horse and buggy era thinking.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This post is misinformation (no offense to OP; I'm sure it wasn't intentional).

The Republicans forced through a law requiring a special election and setting that deadline as described in the image, but the state constitution allows the governor to simply appoint a replacement. The law is unconstitutional and therefore null and void.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago

And yet the spineless fucking governor won’t appoint a replacement right now. It isn’t 4D chess, it’s just cowardice.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Pretty sure the law would have to be challenged in court, which would undoubtedly be appealed, and then go to the state supreme Court.

[–] Nusm@peachpie.theatl.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By the time all of this plays out in the legal system, it will be all said and done and the Republicans will have gotten their way anyway.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Who has already ruled against this same law in another case.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

I agree this whole controversy is attracting weird misinformation.

The state constitution gives the governor power to appoint replacements in the event of a vacancy.

The legislature passed a law in 2021 requiring the governor to choose an appointment from the list provided by the state party of the outgoing Senator's party.

Then, the legislature passed a law in 2024 prohibiting the governor from choosing a replacement at all, and requiring a special election as soon as possible, at least 56 days before the general election.

The governor has publicly stated his position that both laws are unconstitutional under the state constitution, and basically everyone believes that if McConnell's seat becomes vacant that he'll appoint a replacement as a Democrat.

McConnell's term expires at the end of this year, and the general election in November is already going to choose McConnell's full term replacement.

If both laws are unconstitutional: the fake deadline doesn't matter, because the governor can select a replacement without restrictions.

If only the 2024 law is unconstitutional (but the 2021 law is constitutional): hiding McConnell's death and delaying the vacancy is counterproductive for Republicans, because it just prevents the Republicans from filling McConnell's seat (where he's currently unable to vote) with a Republican who can vote.

If the 2024 law is constitutional: hiding McConnell's death and delaying the announcement doesn't do anything, because replacing a non-voting Senator with a vacancy doesn't change anything anyway, because the general election in November will determine who becomes Senator for the next term that starts on January 1.

Basically, the only way this date makes a difference is if it causes a special election to get the seat filled for the 3 months between September and December, and it's unclear which party would win that seat to basically tip the margin in the Senate up or down half a vote (and not enough to actually tip control of the Senate).

The timing of the Senate vacancy is a very low stakes issue, and doesn't clearly favor one party over the other.

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

McConnell probably is still alive.

Yes, they’re clearly lying about the severity of his condition, but even if he’s brain dead he could be kept on life support and that would be enough to prevent the senate seat from being vacant.

If they did just wait until August 4 to turn off life support thinking it keeps the seat vacant, that would most likely backfire though.

In that scenario the governor could name a replacement immediately because the special election law was ruled unconstitutional.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (22 children)

What I'm not altogether clear on is how keeping his seat empty benefits Republicans. Doesn't this mean that they are short one vote in the Senate?

[–] MattBlackAlien@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It avoids an election they are afraid of losing, which would leave them short one vote and the Democrats up one vote.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Ah, so the election would be bipartisan? That makes sense for the Republicans but doesn't then explain why the Democrats aren't demanding the election go ahead in his absence. The fucker is obviously dead.

I mean, I know the Dems often act as controlled opposition, but this is just embarrassing.

[–] TimboSlice@discuss.online 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Well...it is Kentucky we're talking about here. Not the biggest champions of democracy in this state.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago

It also tests the waters for further ignoring the law and Democrats are so far failing to provide any deterance.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

They know the score with an empty seat and it's still good enough.

They don't want to risk an unknown they didn't need to face.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It's not even an election, it's an appointment. Beshear would get to appoint a Senate seat.

The 2024 law taking that power away from him has already been ruled to violate Kentucky's constitution in another case.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Didn’t Lindsey grahams sister just assume his position? So why doesn’t Mitch’s wife just assume his?

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I believe the rules vary from state to state. I had heard the special election thing was pushed for Kentucky by McConnell himself.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yup, the "rules". Sacred, unbreakable, sacrosanct rules and norms.

Donald has been good for one thing, demonstrating that all the excuses Dems made about norms and rules were just cover for not giving a shit.

Really wish we could elect a progressive that cares enough about stopping fascism to put a bullet in this absurd notion that we have to observe norms in the face of decidedly harmful and abnormal things, like people are living out of their cars and dying for lack fo health care, but that's just a daydream.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lol rules. This guy is most likely dead and avoiding all the rules as it is. Why would it even matter what they did after? Clearly rules don't apply here anyway.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The point of rules is to put up obstacles for the opposition, not yourself!

load more comments
view more: next ›