257
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Metostopholes@midwest.social to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world

Your local government spent thousands of dollars on each one, so return the favor by protecting their investment!

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 65 points 2 weeks ago

If you’re cold, they’re cold. Bring Flock cameras inside.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago

...Walmart bathrooms, and smash them?

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

Set them on fire, it creates heat.

[-] modus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It'll be warm for the rest of its life.

[-] somegeek@programming.dev 25 points 2 weeks ago

This is too peaceful. Use destructive methods

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago

Do you really not understand that this is meant to be an easy tool to disable them, so that someone could do anything (or nothing) else to them safely?

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

And it's technically not damaging the camera. So hard to get prosecuted for vandalism.

[-] nullroot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

You're just putting a nice hat on it!

[-] somegeek@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's silly.

You can just put a normal sock/cloth on them for that.

And the flock guys will just simply remove it and you have spent money on making that fancy cover. You can straight up smash it with the same shovel/stick that it shows in the video instead of dressing it up.

[-] modus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

No one is stopping you from doing these things.

[-] somegeek@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not from the US. But we have similar things where I'm from and most of them are destroyed, even though the penalty might be death.

Our people are too brave.

[-] OutForARip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

It’s performative.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Clean the lenses cover with acetone. You're doing a public service keeping that lenses clean and crisp.

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Cameras are often built with replaceable lenses. If you’re going to do damage, make it count. A metal bat to the side, one good swing… that’s all you really need.

[-] whats_a_lemmy@midwest.social 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Fill the sock with expanding foam then just shlorp it on there

[-] spitfire@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

We’ve got to do what we can to protect corporate property

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Tip: You can fill it with expanding foam right before you install it. That way it won't blow off.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

If they are cold, a little EMP burst will keep them warm the test of their lives.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Dont you tempt me to disassemble thrift store microwaves.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Don't touch that if you're not a radio engineer or something similar!

I also think a microwave oven wouldn't be the best choice...

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Not a radio engineer but I did grow up with someone who worked on radar systems in the military before becoming an electrician. If Im not sure what wires to lick I know who to ask...

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe a directionnal antenna could be interesting...

Keep us updated!

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

A waveguide isnt too hard to make.

This video isnt me, but it shows someone knocking down a drone with a microwave magnetron.

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/FygMuEEraDA

[-] lando55@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

This could land you in deep Barney

[-] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

From what I understand there are sensors other than cameras that you need to worry about that will still be active even with the lens covered

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

why not cut down the pole or destroy the camera, it cost them more to put one back up, also take notice of axon cameras too. it magnifies the cost if you remove the camera, and they spend more to have a person come out and put one back up. a sleeve, paint bull can simply be removed.

[-] fhein@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

as much as I like this idea, I assume it would also magnify the punishment if you get caught.

[-] chefdano3@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

I have never once witnessed or seen anyone destroy a flock camera or its pole. And no prosecutor in the world could convince me that anyone would do such a thing.

[-] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I can't think of a crime that would apply to putting this sock over a Flock camera unless there was substantial evidence linking you to some crime that was committed immediately after you did it in the coverage area.

Obviously it's very easy to think of a crime that would apply to destroying the pole or camera.

[-] stom@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] daannii@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I wonder if you could design these to basically 3d print a frame and then attach cardboard , piece of fabric, or something on the front.

to reduce the filament use and print time.

This is kind of a big print. Good idea though.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps. But instead of a peice of fabric, maybe use a high resolution picture of someone's asshole?

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I like the ideas you bring to the conversation

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I can draw.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well spotted.

[-] modus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Or a photo of an empty road. They'll just think the traffic is really light.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Seems to me like this could be modified to mount a laser pointer to point directly into the lens without having to stand in front of the camera to aim it.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

They do work better/faster at closer range.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

Article doesn't load

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
257 points (98.9% liked)

3DPrinting

23711 readers
110 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS