936

The families of US soldiers who have died in the US-Israeli war against Iran are battling to ensure they receive appropriate pay and benefits for their loved ones.

Libby Klinner, a widow, wrote on social media that the US air force had deemed her ineligible for additional benefits following the death of Major Alex Klinner, her 33-year-old husband, because Congress had not officially declared war.

He was one of six crew members of a KC-135 refuelling aircraft that crashed in western Iraq in March while supporting US strikes against Iran.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] DidIReallySayThat@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

I am not a fan of the military, but man, Hegseth and Trump are driving people away in droves with this kind of crap.

Oh well.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago

Yeah, this is NOT how you plan for a military coup

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

He doesn't have to pretend he cares anymore after you can't do anything for him.

[-] TimboSlice@discuss.online 1 points 5 days ago

They'll keep glazing on this fool

[-] Frettchen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Maybe he put all the personal into a not war to be not in America?

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

When Vance was asked about this at a press conference, he asked the reporter for the widow's contact information (because the Pentagon doesn't have it?), and assured that she would get everything she's entitled to.

What do you want to bet that she'll receive a visit from some military goons, who will tell her that she will get ALL that she is entitled to, which is NOTHING, because he didn't die in an official war, and if she doesn't shut the fuck up about it, she'll be arrested and deported to Africa for being an undocumented alien?

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

It’s an answer a junior customer service rep would give when they have no idea how the organization or any processes actually work.

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

The USA has become a sort of Simpsons/Black Mirror crossover episode.

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Although Donald Trump, the US president, has repeatedly called US military operations against Iran a war, he backed Mr Vanceon Friday, saying US strikes were "intermittent".

He said "A lot of people don't call it a war. I call it a military conflict, because it's small potatoes for us."

I can’t wait for this guy to shut the fuck up.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

What a disgusting blowhard bullshitter.

[-] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago

I'm not sure pissing off the (still alive) people you trained to be killers is the best idea.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

He has done so for years and they follow all orders to this day. So obviously no reason to stop treating them like shit.

[-] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

That doesn't mean there aren't plans of a coup brewing. It would be a bad coup if we knew about it.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 5 days ago

Why? Not like they’re gonna coup this douchebag

[-] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

We couldn't possibly know that. If we knew about them planning a coup, it would be a failed coup.

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Somehow, we can afford to pay Mitch McConnell to take 3 months off, and hundreds of millions of dollars for Trump to play golf (with 50 secret service), but widow of dead soldier? That's where we draw the line

[-] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 days ago

Since its inception, the US government has never liked paying soldiers for war. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Mutiny_of_1783

Alexander Hamilton didn't even want to pay the IOUs back, until he decided that many were owned by investors that had bought them from soldiers. The quote was something to the effect of, "those investors are true Americans and they should get their money." The Dollop podcast has a good 4-parter on Hamilton that covers that and other issues.

[-] Snowies@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Human history really is just a long convoluted story of class warfare isn’t it…

Why the fuck is it so hard for these absolute demons to just fucking share?

Is sharing really that bad? Is exerting yourself on others to spite their will really so addictive and so intoxicating?

… why?… I don’t fucking see it.

Why is power so delicious to some people? Why can nothing less sate their palates?

I genuinely don’t fucking get it. To me, a good gathering with good people and good food, and then to go home with a kind partner who genuinely desires me — is heaven on earth. A day with all of it is a day my heart is full and my chin is high.

What compels someone to look at that as though it’s some pittance, and the real prize is when ONLY YOU are allowed satisfaction???? Why do some people need others to suffer in order for them to feel pleasure?????????????????

[-] MountainVeil@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago

They're sociopaths, I guess. Something isn't wired right in their heads.

[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Didn't this also contribute directly to the business plot and not wanting to pay an army of veterans camped on the front lawn of the Whitehouse?

[-] empireo223@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

That's wild.

[-] SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social 6 points 6 days ago

Oh wow, the administration of conmen have conned more men 🙄

But fr good fuck them

[-] Klostein@reddthat.com 6 points 6 days ago

"A lot of people don't call it a war. I call it a military conflict, because it's small potatoes for us."

Apparently he has small potatoes 🥔🥔🤏

[-] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Why would it matter if we're at war or not?

It's combat and someone died as part of it.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 days ago

That's so fucking cool! I am a part of a union that is voting to strike. I realize that some people have financial opportunities in going through the military. Fuck you. War machine. Your fault.

[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

So much winning Americans.

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

That's bullshit. You know what else is bullshit? That the trumpstein files haven't been released. Innocent people do not try to hide like this and innocent people aren't named in the trumpstein files more than God is named in the Bible.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

Stupid loopholes

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
936 points (99.7% liked)

politics

31107 readers
2114 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS