Oh look another one of the same person
Now that's what I call where are the Epstein files
She looks like she's in a porno parody of a press briefing, wtaf.
Wassup, step Press Secretary...
That perverted fuck sure has a type.
He really wants to bang his daughter.
Again, perhaps.
I'd rather not speculate. There's enough shit that's plainly visible that we don't need to guess at things.
It's not a guess, he said so on camera.
Why does every woman in his circle look like a low rent porn star?
Woah, woah, woah
Do NOT associate those fine upstanding pillars of society with people who work for Trump, thank you very much
Hey guys, I'm starting to believe that the people Trump puts in those important positions aren't selected for their competence.
What do you mean? She clearly has MAGA face. Isn't that the competence that's required?
Incorrect. She is clearly blondish.
As dumb as Trump is, I doubt he even knows how to pick a competent person for any job.
He makes his choices based on his desire to be the smartest person in the room.
One of the complaints he had from his first term was that he was prevented from doing things because he was surrounded by "people who think they're smarter than me"...
His lawyers, for all their failings, have managed to keep him out of prison so far. (Having a few judges in his pocket doesn’t hurt.)
Tbf the us citizens at large kept him out of prison via the vote. I mean he probably wouldn’t have gone to prison because he’s rich and connected to all the people he pretends to hate and pretend to hate him but the voters at least put the nail in the coffin on the idea.
Yeah, his lawyers don’t have that great a track record; Giuliani was his lawyer for a while. He probably gets lucky occasionally, but I really think he’s too stupid to know the difference between a competent an incompetent person in any field.
Well...He was convicted on 34 criminal counts. He didn't go to prison only because of a feckless judge who was too scared of his responsibility to give a meaningful sentence and didn't punish him at all.
what's wrong with her face ?
Cosmetic Surgeon: So what kind of work did you want to get done?
Sycophant #273: I want my cheekbones doubled and my lips filled in with silicon. Not silicone, that's too woke.
"I'm 28, but I want to look 50"
"I want everyone who sees me to do a double take and then frown."
Frown? I see them and get the same look I get when I see a car crash.
“And I want my eyebrows replaced with upside down Nike symbols colored with sharpie!”
Maralago face.
How many Mooches do we think she'll last?
How long can she last? Trump said soon after: “I thought she was very good.” But the Lincoln Project, an anti-Trump group, tweeted an image of the Zachbot beside a lettuce to evoke Liz Truss, who lasted only 49 days as British prime minister.
And Anthony Scaramucci, who was Trump’s communications director for just 11 days, a period now known as “a Scaramucci”, tweeted: “The clock is running. Thus far 1/11th of a Scaramucci.”
When the Mooch is giving you the Grim Reaper treatment, it might be time to self-terminate.
Oh, wow, I could’ve accurately described her to a police sketch artist before I ever saw her.
As is tradition
Designated Blond #???...
By September 2025, Zacharia had worked as legal advisor for Fix California, a political organization; had served on the board of advisors at White Rose Resistance, an antiabortion advocacy group; and was a member of the Pepperdine University School of Law's dean council. She had additionally served as director of development for special projects at Pepperdine University.
Pepperdine University is a private research university affiliated with the Churches of Christ
:-|
Zacharia became deputy assistant secretary of homeland security for public affairs in February 2026. She announced her resignation the following month. According to CNN, Zacharia, who lived in California, told an associate that commuting to the Department of Homeland Security's headquarters in Washington, D.C., was not sustainable. In June, Zacharia became a communications advisor to the Trump Media and Technology Group.
Classic case of failing upwards.
White House press secretary Katie Zacharia’s debut was so poor it made Karoline Leavitt look like Cicero.
The newly appointed press secretary spoke slowly and awkwardly during her debut press conference Tuesday, as if she had never seen or uttered the words in front of her prior to taking the podium. Her cadence was clunky, closer to that of a fourth grader reading school announcements over an intercom than a polished political communications professional. It’s clear she was never meant to be more than another blonde conservative placeholder on Fox News. The SNL spoof feels imminent.
Succession really got it spot on : Kerry gives the news on ATN

Hummm ... opened shirt and 2 precisely positioned gold buttons are, it seems, on purpose ... to distract from an empty discourse and likewise head and boss ?
Honestly I didn’t even notice either I those. I just noticed the face that has had some work done on it and the “my boss wishes I was his daughter” overall look.
For a moment I thought this was a link to "Blond air hostess step-daughter HARDCORE double-fisting in the WHITEHOUSE PRESS ROOM moneyshot loud moaning POV"
I thought she did okay for a high school valedictorian speech.
Of course a professional wouldn't need to look down to read their own name.
I don't even think it was quite that level. It came off to me as someone presenting for a a highschool group project that didn't do any of the work, so they were forced to present. It genuinely seemed like the first time she ever read the info.
Jesus Christ she looks like a cadaver
There's some other bitch that looks even worse. She's the wife of one of his boot lickers, and has had a botched surgery that makes her look just cadaverous.
I kept getting "everywhere, like such as" energy here.
Blonde white woman with no talent. Sounds about white.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News