211
There's only one immigrant who should be stripped of their citizenship and deported and that's Elon Musk.
Well, make that 2. melania also lied about her college status to get her citizenship.
President shitstain would love to send back the older-model wife so he can upgrade the newer version more easily
And melenoma
You spelled shot in the face wrong
No there are plenty. The ones who will never be targeted.
Wait... Does this mean we can investigate Melania's EB-1A "Einstein Visa"?
Maybe not, she may have completed at least 3 of the 10 necessary criteria... I'm still suspicious though.
misspelled "Epstein" visa.
No, we can't. They can. But they won't.
What about muskrats visa?
they can strip a huge fraction of Americans of their citizenship
They already have. They've been revoking Visas like crazy and of course the whole H1B thing. Kinda puts to bed the ridiculous notion that they just don't want people here "illegally". They just don't want foreigners here at all. So they take legal immigrants and make them illegal.
Visas are not citizenship.
Revoking citizenship is much more serious
The step from revoking visas of foreign nationals to going after citizens is a big one. They're qualitatively different things
It wasn't just foreign nationals.
US nationals don't have Visas. You're confused.
Then who are you talking about?
Non white foreigners. White South American racists are welcome apparently.
South African racists too
Only if they're trillionaires
Nah, they've been taking in regular non-trillionaire ones too.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-administration-white-south-africans-refugees-afrikaners/
who President Trump has claimed are being oppressed for being White
Wooooow
Also I think that's just the latest batch they took in, they took more of them before that.
Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leadership helped pave the way for this islamophobic, racists, anti-feminist attack on Ilhan Omar. Nancy Pelosi claimed Ilhan Omar anti-semetic, when Omar criticized AIPAC and their outsized role in US elections. That was a multi-week news cycle liberals will almost certainly have memory holed by this time. Democratic leadership floated an effort to censure and paved the way for this attack, and to normalize these kinds of attacks of women in power, of brown people in power, of immigrants in power.
Liberals pave the ground for the role out of fascism. Clock it.
Also, Ilhan is my queen.
And for the reactionaries already downvoting reality to maintain their fantasy about being on the side of good:
Naaah. The downvotes are because of your inability to NOT find a way to somehow spread divisionist bullshit during an upcoming election.
You did this shit in 2024 as well. And everyone outside of your little talkie…. Everyone is tired of it.
I generally tend to agree with and respect @TropicalDingdong, but yeah: that argument has a time and a place and right now is not it.
It was those silencing dissent that handed 2024 to Trump, not those making legitimate critiques during an election and being told to shut up by people who weren't bothered by their own tacit support for genocides: That is a fundamentally losing approach to elections. And everything we have regarding the 2024 post mortem shows this to be the case.
Demanding voters shut up and fall in line during an election? Its an extraordinarily anti-Democratic, and a fundamentally anti-american sentiment. Americans, as a people, will practically always resent being told what to do. They are willful like a toddler is willful, often times to their own detriment. Do what you are doing here, and you push voters away from your preferred party.
It's also a fundamentally anti Democratic sentiment, and this is something Democrats need to do far more work to address, because time and time again, they show themselves to be a highly anti-Democratic party. The Hillary campaign and DWS as dnc chair in 2016, where DNC attorney Bruce Spiva argued to the supreme Court that the party had the right to: “go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way”. Then their sabatoging of Bernie in 2020, their coronation of Biden and then Harris in 2024, I mean shit, the more recent Mayors race in NYC, and just about every primary where a now leading candidate was being being attacked by the corporate power structurs within the DNC. Democrats as leadership and as a party do not respect the democratic process. Leadership is willing to weight the scales, and voter accept and expect this.
Democrats have a severe problem with both the act and the idea of democracy. And by agreeing with my opponent in this debate, you are showing a preference for an authorarian, anti Democratic, and in my opinion, fundamentally anti American form of politics.
Yeah. I don’t. They’re a divisionist fountain of propaganda.
load more comments
(14 replies)
If this happens and we don't get violent...we've given up. jfc.
Much worse things have happened, and nobody got violent. Americans will only get violent when their direct benefits are endangered, not for the sake of others.
You're one of those. What lets you sleep at night is the lie that this next horrible thing can't happen because if it does, then something would finally be done about it. And then it happens, and nothing is done, but still you tell yourself that the next horrible thing won't happen because if it did something would finally be done about it
Sorry but do you also have a non-paywalled version of that Stephen Miller article?
You can use archive.is or register with the link I gave before. Your choice. The specific quote:
Last year, [Trump] reportedly quipped during a campaign meeting that if it was up to Mr. Miller, the population of the United States would be only 100 million people and they’d all resemble Mr. Miller
The US population is something above 300 million
"Oh, I know. But I just couldn't vote for Harris. I have to sleep at night."
Mmm. Guverment strong.
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
211 points (99.1% liked)
politics
31414 readers
3766 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS