197
submitted 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) by Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone

If you graduated before they implemented this or aren’t American, the system they started to use to teach kids how to read is called three cuing. They teach kids to identify unknown words by guessing based on clues in pictures with the sentences, what word would ‘make sense’, and whether the answer they came up with looks right based on the first letter.

As you may have noticed, none of that is reading a word. These are strategies that borderline illiterate people will use to try to understand words, and for decades it’s been the method used by many schools across the country.

So that person you’re arguing with online who keeps going off on bizarre rants barely related to anything you said might not be a troll, they might just be functionally illiterate due to having never been taught to read. Yaaay!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

That's simply not true, fortunately. All public schools are to follow common core standards and that includes phonics (sounding out words) over sight words and certainly over context guessing. Going contrary to the core is possible, I guess, but certainly not the norm.

If you're curious, the debate was mostly settled in the 90s, during what my PhD advisor called the "reading wars." Well, mostly settled... sight words still have a place in reading, especially when a word is contrary to its phonics. But basically, policy has prioritized phonics since Clinton, with to only some revision under Obama.

That's not to say Americans aren't dumb; doesn't mean much if standards aren't met. But it's not as simple as saying we're taught incorrectly. I could give a variety of reasons, although Lemmy users can probably guess poverty, politics and capitalism are pretty central to a lot of it.

[-] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 25 points 4 hours ago

Always remember when discussing with US citizens:

Only 13% of the population is proficient in each of these three areas—able to compare viewpoints in two editorials; interpret a table about blood pressure, age, and physical activity; or compute and compare the cost per ounce of food items.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_illiteracy -> second to last paragraph of the first part.

[-] AgentSeven@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

1 in 4 people you see walking on the street in America are functionally illiterate. More than half can only read at somewhere around a 6th grade level or below. The US glorifies and revels in ignorance.

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 2 points 2 hours ago

yep. tis why my wife laments ever setting feet in turtle island. she knew she was part the 3% able to recite, sign, and localize curricula with goals, criteria, and pedigree for a generation that will never surpass her. Traumas are mitigatable, but not the isolation that no peer like her will ever exist.

[-] anewfox@lemmy.zip 23 points 5 hours ago

i lived in california from ages 4-8 and we did phonics basically every grade level.

i moved to florida about 3/4 through 3rd grade and that was when i learned about educational standards at the ripe old age of 8 when everyone in my new third grade class read at a first grade level and even my teacher didn't seem to know what she was doing.

i have a formative memory from my first day. i asked the kid next to me when recess is, and his response was, "what's recess?"

[-] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 66 points 8 hours ago

I’m thankful every day for my kid’s Montessori school. 5 years old and I’m already to the point where we read together every night for fun, but I’m not really needed. Sometimes I see the reading light on after bedtime, but I let it slip. 🥹

[-] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 7 hours ago

good parent ☺️

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] azalea_flower@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 hours ago

(I did make another comment but I was being a little silly)

It's pretty insane to me that they don't teach phonics, since that's very important to actually reading a word, especially aloud. In my original comment I was ignoring that reading included determining the meaning of a word, but I was conflating reading with only reading aloud or simply identifying a word.

Three cueing can be important to reading and would probably help out on the spot, but is something I (and I assume many others) picked up naturally anyway from just reading a lot. I don't expect it to be taught in school instead of phonics, and it should not replace just looking up a word in the dictionary. This just seems absolutely absurd to me.

[-] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 hours ago

That is...concerning.

I kinda like to play with writing systems, like Avatarian (Script made for Avatar Legend of Aang and Seven Havens), where each glyph is mapped onto a sound in US English IPA rather than just redesigning glyphs in the Latin Alphabet and I sometimes wonder if it would've been better if we had this system (with glyphs for "ch" and "Ll" of course).

Now reading that I think it might be a better system.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

(with glyphs for “ch” and “Ll” of course)

INB4 that user who insists on using thorn characters shows up to fight the good fight.

[-] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

JOKES ON YOU, AVATARIAN HAS A THORN CHARACTER IN BUILT INTO THE SYSTEM!

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

On the contrary...

[-] hakase@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Here's the comment I made last time this idea popped up in a thread:

Even if we were to adopt something like the Shavian alphabet, it would only work for a few generations at most until sound change and dialect divergence built up enough to once again strongly divorce spelling from pronunciation. Not to mention the fact that it's impossible to come up with a phonetic* alphabet that accounts in a useful way for dialect differences, even just in American English.

This has already happened with hangul, probably the paradebeispiel for successful intentionally designed phonetic systems: spellings that were once phonetic (though, again, in only certain dialects) have now become conventional due to sound change.

So, in addition to the dialect problem, you'd end up having to either completely replace the alphabet again every hundred or so years, or you'd be right back where we currently are. Plus, interventions into the spelling system will a) make older publications harder to read without mass-translating them all into the new systems every few decades which b) will create reading difficulties for the generations that end up having to switch with each new update.

Not to mention the fact that spelling things the way we currently do preserves etymological information (though imperfectly) about the words in question.

That isn't to say our current system is perfect, but rather that any such system is arbitrary, and will eventually become conventionalized either way without active, persistent intervention that comes with its own significant downsides.

*Used here in the lay sense, not the linguistic sense

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 0 points 2 hours ago

better system

Nothing beats shorthand. Gregg Centennial is the most versatile. Capitalism is why shorthand barely praxis today.

cc @abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone

[-] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

A quick look at Gregg shorthand and I'm not too sure how it would work. I mean it's great shorthand but as an everyday writing system on things like signs and books it fails because a lot of the glyphs look the same.

Avatarian does a similar thing but with distinct glyphs and putting them into blocks creates something that can be considered symbols for easier reading, especially considering the most common words tend to be the shortest.

[-] alapakala@quokk.au 0 points 1 hour ago

if you’ve ever used an abudiga, you were already shorthanding. Gregg was designed for over a 100 years to abudiga IndoEuropean phonetics. What “signs” do you see incapable of being abudigad? Entire libraries already came and went in Gregg.

I’ve read Bryan Konietzko’s conlang. I am literally a conlang.

I just prefer logograms over abjads.

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 7 hours ago

Sadly, the generation was lost to the war on drugs. We were overzealous and refused to let them even get Hooked on Phonics.

[-] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 27 points 8 hours ago

I learn new words by searching for the definition. Is that not a thing anymore? You don't have to go find a dictionary anymore. You can literally pull out your phone and type: "define xxx". I really hate our education system.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 8 hours ago

Oh, this is worse than that: it’s not just about their vocabulary being stunted, it’s that they can’t even recognize words they know because they don’t know how to sound out a word. Grim stuff.

[-] X@piefed.world 11 points 7 hours ago

Oh fuck me, that is grim. No way to know what that which you’re looking at means. That’s fucking terrifying! “Huh. The bottle’s got some tall, red letter words and exclamation points. I bet it means that this shit’s gonna taste awesome!”

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Parents are both overworked and lazy here in the States, are you surprised our education is faltering? This is by conservative design, the schools are defunded, teachers underpaid, schools are understaffed, under supplied and corrupt. The conservatives want the poor to be their new slaves, and the conservatives need them dumb enough to keep voting for them until the conservatives take that away too.

We're a powder keg waiting to explode while being manipulated and having access to all kinds of guns, at some point things are going to explode, or we'll just boil like the frog.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 7 hours ago

The counterargument is that English is uniquely bad for phonetical spelling.

Never make fun of someone who says a word strangely. They may have only ever read it.

I’m not sure that phonics is the underlying reason American people don’t learn to read. I think there’s deep complex reasons for that.

[-] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago

There's some truth to that, but it's also important that phonics lay down the foundation for reading, and let young readers identify the complexities behind the rules, and then internalize the meta-rules governing which rules apply where.

It's frustrating that tough doesn't rhyme with though or through or bough (or that none of those others rhyme with each other). Or that many homographs aren't homophones, to where you need to rely on context to know which pronunciation or meaning applies to words like "read," "lead," or "unionized."

Still, how else are you gonna do it? Lay down the basics, then layer on some exceptions that generally come in as loanwords (entree) or proper nouns (Xi Jinping), but always building on a foundation where new words can be encountered and pronounced. We can read and pronounce newly invented words easily, whether it's slang like "mogging" or fanciful corporate trademarks like "Reddit." We can deal with the exceptions as they come up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

My mother was a learning disabilities teacher consultant and hated 3 cuing. Most students sent to her once it started were fine when taught not that way.

[-] moth@anarchist.nexus 3 points 5 hours ago

moth has younglings, and they definitely were taught to sound out words that can be. some words cannot be sounded out, those are called sight words. moth supposes that this isn't something that's nationwide.

[-] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I love everything about this comment

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

What's the alternative?? Just telling them?

[-] cowfodder@lemmy.zip 13 points 7 hours ago

I'm in my mid 40's and American, and I was taught to figure out word meanings from context clues back in elementary school. This isn't a new thing.

[-] jaycifer@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

This isn’t about deriving meaning necessarily, but recognizing what word a word is. Take the example statement “the technique is ubiquitous across the nation.”

What you’re describing is using context clues to determine that ‘ubiquitous’ is an adjective to describe the technique and maybe that it has to do with how much it exists across the nation.

The technique described above is a counterpart to phonics. If you had never seen the word ‘ubiquitous’ before you could still phonetically parse out yoo(maybe “uh”)-bih-qui-tuss. With three-cueing, if ‘ubiquitous’ is a brand new word for you, you might pronounce it ‘all’ because that’s the word you already know that might make sense in that sentence. My understanding is that you’re not recognizing that those are two distinct but similar words, you’re just trained to guess at what the sentence is trying to say.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 7 hours ago

If you were taught how to sound out words you weren’t taught the way a lot of kids are taught to read today. Being able to read the whole sentence and guessing based on context already puts you significantly ahead of kids who have been taught with the three cueing method.

[-] rosahaj@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 7 hours ago

The technique isn't the issue, rather it's the fact that American kids are taught to use context before they're taught to differentiate the words from one another, apparently.

[-] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 hours ago

Yeah context clues are super important, but they're not a replacement for phonics

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
197 points (96.2% liked)

196

7156 readers
3013 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS