1808
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by fireweed@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] AvaMadison_27@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago

Imagine how different the world would be if billionaires competed to solve problems instead of competing to become richer. What a world that would be!

[-] Glaedr304@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

To be honest, I think the billionaires think they are solving problems. I also think that they believe if they had the money they could do more good with it. They are obviously wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I had this vision of the military. Imagine a natural disaster like a tsunami is about to strike the Middle East. Here comes the carrier force and they start launching what looks like tomahawk missiles. Instead of blowing people up on the ground they open up in air and drop rafts and life preservers. The military has shown up to save countless people instead of murdering them.

[-] DrSoap@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

National guard? I think that's them?

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yes, along those lines only the major force(Army, Marines, Navy, Air Force, etc.) would be like a nation wide coast/national guard that goes around helping nations out in times of disasters. In-between disasters they could act like a worldwide corp of engineers improving areas that need it.

[-] Dialectical_Specialist@quokk.au 100 points 2 days ago

Why do billionaires despise efficient uses of money?

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because they think they know better than us hoi polloi. Seriously. There's a psych term that escapes me, but once a person gains wealth and power, they think they know better than the rest of us and the rules don't apply to them.

One of the most horrifying things I know about humans is that almost all of us are susceptible to this and it's not simply a matter of people kissing their ass, though that certainly "helps".

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because they don’t actually have the money. The value of their holdings are used as collateral on loans. They use the loans to pay for their expenses and are just constantly in debt. This avoids all tax consequences for them. And it is fucking stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Napster153@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They don't see money as we do. It's the control in the price of items and buying power where the real value is at.

These sort of control freak cultists have existed in human societies since time immemorial. They have, can and will always find ways to exploit everyone.

Last year was religion, yesterday ideology and today it's finance. None of these things in a vacuum were meant to debilitate humans until these same people rigged the system.

Future humans will be condemning our capitalist ways like we do feudal societies. They won't see the difference.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 2 days ago

they like to hoard it, and use other peoples money thats why. thier net worth is actually in thier stocks/investments for the most part.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 days ago

Correct (when it comes to billionaires; Sam Altman and his ilk intentionally caused the RAM shortage by buying RAM their companies are not using and should be held accountable).

Billionaires would be impossible in a properly civilised society, which would implement progressive taxes so that anyone with a wealth above, say, ten times the median wealth of the population or 25 times the wealth of the poorest person (citizen or not) in the nation (whichever's lowest at the time) are taxed to the point that their wealth can increase no further, with the resulting income being invested on public services so that personal wealth is irrelevant except for luxury items.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Quit making perfect sense. You're making the capitalists nervous and ruining the hopes and dreams of all the Questrader's out there. /s

[-] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I knew there'd be folks in here claiming it's "fake money." They can liquidate when they want to, it's not "fake."

[-] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not only is it real money when its invested, typically the rich can just borrow against those shares instead of having to liquidate anything to pay for things.

For example when they need $40b to purchase a website or media corp to use so they can have better control of the narrative, they just get a loan because everyone knows they'll be able to make the payments, instead of selling enough shares to tank the thing that inflates their networth beyond all reason.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They can liquidate part of it. If they liquidate all of it then most will disappear into thin air.

If you're Elon Musk and own a large part of Tesla and SpaceX and you sell all your shares, both companies crater HARD.

Just remove stock from anyone who owns over 1% of any publicly traded company and nationalize all index funds' assets (yes, that includes retirement funds). Problem solved.

Or just cap total wealth at ~5 mill, indexed to the median income so there's no need for legislation like with minimum wage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Sam Altman doesn't know how dumb terminals operate.

[-] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 55 points 2 days ago

I get what he's saying, but billionaires don't have "billions" in "banks".

[-] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 62 points 2 days ago

Just because it isn't hundred dollar bills in their mattress doesn't mean they don't have it. They can leverage what they own in exchange for goods and services equivalent to the value of their holdings, the exact mechanism doesn't really matter.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 51 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We just watched musky light $500,000,000 on fire last month they clearly got the liquidity.

[-] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 32 points 2 days ago

The crazy part is, thats the equivalent of me buying a combo at Wendy's.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Potocobe@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

The only actual cash billionaire I can think of is the guy that created and sold Minecraft. That dude has billions in the bank. Or at least he did for a minute or two before I’m sure he invested a ton of it. All the other billionaires just own billions worth of stuff for the most part. Banks don’t even leave money in banks. They invest or loan out all of it and keep the returns. That’s the scam, same as it ever was.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BilSabab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

the catch is that those billions are not even real for the most part.

[-] 87Six@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago

I think we should extract the water from Sam Altman's body and use it to cool a datacenter

[-] jonesey71@lemmus.org 8 points 2 days ago

The blood could also replace the motor oil in my car. Use all parts of the Sam Altman.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] phase@lemmy.8th.world 12 points 2 days ago

I would be ok to rent my RAM to this guy. Of course it would have a price. We are in a democracy and market is free.. Right?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's the thing; the billions don't sit in a bank account but in the ~~stock~~ betting market. They would be heavily taxed otherwise.

[-] JC1@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Just tax unrealised capital gain then. A progressive tax too so small investors wouldn't really be penalized much.

[-] Sparky@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

billions sitting in billionaire bank accounts? You mean investment portfolios? You obviously don't know wealth management :D

[-] halezinflames@lemmus.org 5 points 1 day ago

Damn maybe unused ram really is wasted ram

[-] incompetent@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

I'd gladly give up half of my RAM if Altmann gave up half of his fortune.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

He bankrolled a longevity company called Retro Bio to the tune of $150M. It’s lunacy and the money would be way better spent by the NIH as tax dollars.

[-] Thor_Whale@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

Careful your brakes might not work if you continue to think like this.

[-] Tenderizer@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Also, the idea that accelerating AI development should be the goal is I think silly.

If anything we should be slowing down the RAM factories. We have too much RAM. We need less RAM.

[-] Venator 8 points 2 days ago

It's not underused if they're running windows with a few tabs open in chrome with sites that have similar ram usage to chatgpt... 😅

Wasted in terms of bloat maybe in some cases, but it is being "used" 😅

[-] hamsamrich@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I have 624 GB of DDR5 6000 MHz RAM just sitting around. Sam Altman, you can lick my butt and suck on my balls

[-] gingernate@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

I'll lick your butt for some of that ram

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Did a 2 slip in between that 6 and 4? Or how do you end up with that much DDR5?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2026
1808 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

12525 readers
4073 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS