201
Bye bitch
Gtfo.
We don't negotiate with terrorists.
And nothing of value was lost.
Do what it takes to flip him. He is loyal to party — gop. He is no dem. He is not thinking of country or those that elected him. He is a Trump in Obama clothing.
No one cares about you anymore Fetterfuck. Do whatever you want, as long as I don't have to hear about it anymore.
Dont let the door hit you!
That's great, John. There's something I've been meaning to show you...
I was looking for meme-y pictures of doors, but then I noticed Jim's "I'm gonna fucking kill you" eyes, and I had to go with that.
Two birds, one scone. Let's do this!
This is EXACTLY why Schumer must go.
If Fetterman is backing him, that's all we need to know of his true colors.
Highly encourage everyone to tie Schumer to Fetterman at every turn.
Van Hollen for Senate Majority Leader!
We need to Chuck the Schmuck!
K, bye.
Take out the trash, Democrats.
If i understand correctly, he isn't as important anymore for any majorities. So they should kick him, really.
John Fetterman will threaten to quit democratic party if they declare, long gone, Kristi Noem puppy shootings a bad thing.
Nobody cares what fetterman thinks.
Nobody cares. Democrats have a sold majority.
He was hoping for a 51/49 senate to stay relevant.
It's a real shame since he could have been a refreshing change for the Democrats - at first he seemed genuine, authentic, rather working class kind of aesthetic, etc. Not someone in his 80s, either, not that I care all that much about that, but at least I thought he would be around a while.
Then he has a stroke and turns more conservative. Lots of people saying (now) that he was always like that, but his own wife does not seem to agree....
Oh well, if he doesn't switch to R, I hope they primary him with someone way better. If he switches, I hope the Democratic choice destroys him next election.
Working class aesthetic? The bum wore pjs in the floors of Congress 😂
Yeah, but it sent a rather amusing message about the notion of how a very dated dress code (suits and ties? Why even the fuck. Humans can be wildly inconsistent in their positions on things, that is for sure.) is supposed to be the important part.
I cannot wait to vote his ass out 🙏
Even if he doesn't switch to R, it will feel like....
Edit: See comment below. I jumped the gun with this one.
~~Strokes do end up heightening the worst of a person's personality since their cognitive faculties are no longer at the point of enforcing a filter.~~ I'm not sure if strokes cause a person's core beliefs to do a complete 180.
I know my father had problems regulating emotion but at least he was mostly aware that he had become Pet Seminary dad..Strokes suck.
Fetterman is still an ass
Pet Seminary dad
Pet Seminary 2?
Strokes do end up heightening the worst of a person’s personality
This is absolutely not true. Like any brain injury, strokes can damage different parts of someone's brain and it can be impossible to predict how they may change. It could affect memory, personality, mobility, speech, you name it. Regarding personality, it could change in almost infinite ways, or not at all.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Narcissistic prick
What's funny is that he can only do this once. Wasn't he already floating the idea of flipping to R anyway?
I say people (in Congress) just ignore him. The rest of us? We can point and laugh, of course.
Good, no one wants turncoat Fetterman anyway. Go have tea with Haley Stevens and leave us to do our business.
Also the fact that Fetterman is so adamant about Schumer should tell us all we need to know about Schumer.
John Quisling Fetterman
load more comments
(1 replies)
Fascist threatens to be fascist. More at 11.
He's already a DINO. Gtfo already.
Remind me what part of Israel his district is in?
Oh no! Anyway....
He’s screaming now that he isn’t relevant anymore
As a Pennsylvanian: Good. Fuck off.
Quit already ! Shut the fuck up and quit
yeah, what a crybaby
Dude you’ve already left.
Holding criminals accountable for their crimes is not "payback."
Please, for the love of god, join the Republicans. Israel isn't going to continue bribing you after you switch sides, you fucking moron.
load more comments
(1 replies)
What an asshole.
I bet he's so bummed that Democrats have such a margin, though.
“It would be troubling if my caucus elects someone like Van Hollen that has really made his name being very anti-hostile to Israel, you know. If you are going to be angry or hostile towards any countries in the region, why not make that, you know, Iran or Hezbollah or Hamas as well too?”
33% hit rate on naming countries in the middle east. That's probably about the percentage left of his brain too to be fair.
I like "anti-hostile". Guy can't even comprehend double negatives
If anything, this validates that Schumer is wrong for progress. Interesting how it’s all these AIPAC backed politicians that are thwarting progress and promoting genocide. 🤔
load more comments
(1 replies)
Lol, is that supposed to be some kind of threat?
You already vote and talk like a traitor, wtf difference does it make? I'd rather turncoats be on the outside of party discussions, personally. Give him the Haley Stevens treatment, now.
What can we do for him to promise to get off our planet?
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2026
201 points (97.2% liked)
politics
31883 readers
3730 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS