I dont think i've ever considered the infodump from that angle.. it carries none of that intent whatsoever. I just get carried by the wave, happily so. Seems insane that it would be received as a diss.
TerdFerguson
the perpetual, nigh-unbroken chain of social rejection tells me as much. so yeah
I don't think many people are saying that. It's the heel-turn by the USA that causes them to prefer China lately.
As a Canadian, I personally agree that my stance on China has become more favourable because of the shift in perspective that the USA currently offers. Not because they've suddenly stopped imprisoning Uyghurs for existing.
Sam Altman understands nothing about being human.
Fucking wanker.
It is a common human trait, regardless of neurotype.
PLENTY of reasons, but also Trump.
Yes, I imagine that's a significant part of it.
The next thing to do is to accept their behavior toward each other, that's their relationship. Neither one of them is the good guy here, by the sounds of it, so don't let them drag you intro that miserable world any more.
I think a lot of people go no contact because they can't figure out how to just neutrally disengage. It's a valid option, but I do think you could develop a selective kind of apathy for their nonsense and still appreciate their positive things they add to your life (if there are any?)
I can appreciate why train-gang is a thing. Not my thing though; this picture has no effect on me.
Involuntarily rendered muted or, occasionally, enraged.
So, I’m not a diagnostician, but if you have above average ability to read social cues, then that sure sounds like it excludes a diagnosis of autism.
I'm glad you disqualified your opinion before you shared it because ability for reading cues is a very narrow aspect of what could contribute to difficult social interactions.
Some of us develop a heightened kind of vigilance for social cues because of how we've been punished for our natural lack of understanding them, and that doesn't necessarily confer ANY ability to effectively act on those cues appropriately in the way we ought to.
very detailed hypotheses all through out. I can agree with some of it. Some of it seems like it was given too much thought without referring substance to back it up.
6/10