This guy got an $18k raise for 162 stops over a two month period. That means he's getting paid about $111 per attempted kidnapping.

And then has the audacity to claim "he doesn't like to break up families".

My brother in Christ, there's about a million easier ways to make $111 than destroying someone's life. You're not doing it for the money.

You're doing it because you want to.

Wait until you see the new pilot for the Judge Gowran show...

Pedantic Putz Punted by Petulant Pedo

L4D2.

$0.

Christmas of 2013.

Yes, I am the Ghost of Christmas Present...

I think this gal has a better chance at making it to Mars than Liz...

Not gonna be impressed until they teach it to fetch.

That's odd. When I wear my "Not a serial killer" shirt, I don't get any questions. Or any conversation for that matter.

It does make the supermarket checkout lane move extra fast tho...

I wouldn't. I'd let the community decide via voting. You don't engender discussion by silencing speakers because they don't meet your requirements of legitimacy. If there's a question of legitimacy or bad faith discussion, identify it, talk about it, and downvote the hell out of it if needed.

But don't remove it. Once you do, you're no longer curating a discussion. You're promoting an agenda.

Rejecting a voice out of hand because of whom its coming from is blatant censorship, and a tacit admission that your ideas can't compete with theirs in the arena of public discourse.

/c/politics is a hive of scum and pedantry, with a healthy dose of hypocrisy. If you say:

Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading

...while allowing articles that are blatant AI summaries from trash rags like the DailyBeast and Business Insider simply because they're tied to a company, you're not fostering political discussion. You're advancing a corporate agenda.