[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

If you want to be.

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

The site would have a very Google-esque feel. The listings would look similar.

That's the plan. Moderators for categories.

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sure.

So, in the US, you're innocent until proven guilty. You cannot be guilty of a crime until you're proven guilty of it. Speeding tickets require a judge to determine guilt.

A lot of US states are making it illegal to be homeless. They're rounding people up and sending them to asylums or work programs. Which means. . . they're being imprisoned without a trial. And. . . If they're given a trial by judge (like with tickets), the crime they're committing is something they couldn't have avoided in the first place.

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Pretty much.

It also doesn't catalog individual pages. It lists domains and their descriptions.

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

As a capitalist, I can stand behind this. Valid criticism.

If corporations are people, and all people are the same under the law...

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Well, they'd select the longest workers, with the minimal nutrient requirements, and breed them, lol.

46
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

About a week ago, I created a post detailing a web index I was working on.

I've implemented a few policy changes, after realizing I want this to be more like a library than a search engine.

I remember walking through library shelves as a kid, finding all the subjects I could learn about fascinating. And I'd really like to recreate that experience with this site. An infinitely scrollable catalog that transitions from subject to subject to subject, treating individual domains as books, with rankings (0-9) determined by a mixture of author authority and cultural relevance.

Current Plans:

  • I'm removing the index.json requirement, and allowing users to simply submit domains for inclusion within the catalog.
  • Domains are sorted via an alphanumeric XXX.XXX.XXX format (so cultural anthropology would be SCI.ANT.CUL)
  • I also have plans to put the entire catalog on IPFS, for public accountability.
  • I'm also no longer referring to it as an index, but a catalog.

You could even have a plethora of local results: USA.KTY.BWG, DEU.BER.MIT

Here is the current UX: https://imgur.com/a/QdXTmbz I'm looking for suggestions to make it a better experience. The name is just a placeholder.

58
submitted 2 days ago by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's because I don't want that.

I remember, as a kid, wandering the local library. Looking at all the books. Seeing the call numbers and author names. Exploring the shelves, as they transitioned from topic to topic to topic.

My idea is to treat the Internet as a giant library, with domains being books on a shelf, and allowing my users to start at a random location, and then peruse the different listings as they transition from slight variations of the main topic.

With all due respect, you don't have the vision, man. To start looking at cultural anthropology, then have a link to a biological anthropology blog 3 lines down? That's the goal. It's not about a narrowed search. It's about cataloging something, so people can go looking for it. To enjoy the hunt.

10
submitted 2 days ago by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I'm building a catalog for the Internet -- think Google crosses old school library card catalogs, meets Dewey Decimal System, and will eventually require donations. What's the best platform to use for this?

The entire database will be made available to the public, for private offline use in custom desktop applications, or other sites with alternative ideas.

I'd like a goal meter, to show how close we are to reaching our funding goals and for the platform to have a good reputation.

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Thank you 🙏️

23
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/programming@programming.dev

Let's assume I have a software application with millions of files. The files receive frequent updates.

Is there a way to distribute those updates across all those devices?

I'm thinking something like Torrents/IPFS/Resilio. . . But they all seem like overkill.

I've been looking at my Search Engine, and thought it would be cool to allow people to download the database themselves, and run a local UI, for maximum privacy.

I would just be creating records within the main database. I could offer searches through the main site and allow people to explore it on their desktops.

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah, pretty much.

If there were a magic hat that made your life Heaven, while your body worked subconsciously, would you wear it?

38
submitted 2 days ago by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Think Matrix. . .

If you could wear a helmet that put you into a blissful simulation, while affluent overlords used your body for labor, pumped in nutrients, managed your reproductive needs, and killed you when everything started falling apart, would you do it?

9
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

The US Census Bureau defines lower class as the lowest 20% of incomes.

Pew defines it as the lowest 2/3 of the median.

If the highest income is $100, 20% is $20.

At 2/3 the median, if the median is $30, lower-class is $20.

Is there a reason they're tying income classes to people within those classes, and not what it costs to survive within the economy?

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 5 points 4 days ago

I forced Ben Shapiro to change his views on gender with well-thought-out counterpoints.

He was literally saying sex and gender were the same. After a spelled out comment on why they weren't, he changed his tune on the next show.

[-] ki4jgt@feddit.org 12 points 4 days ago

That sounds about right.

People who feel they have no value, other than their looks, get aggressive when the thing they spent so long working on doesn't pay off.

67
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I've seen so many men terrified of anything gay themed. I've watched men refuse to be friends with people who didn't act manly enough. I've watched grown-ass men bark "f@gg0+," every time they saw 2 dudes expressing an interest in one another on TV. Pink Pony Club, I Kissed a Girl, and several other songs are a complete turn-off for them.

I have to ask, what scares you guys? What, sitting in the pit of your stomach, do you feel and think when you see gay things?

21
submitted 6 days ago by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Thinking it would be cool to start a newspaper in Gregg Shorthand, and curious how many readers there are.

31
MongoDB or Redis? (feddit.org)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/programming@programming.dev

About a decade ago, I tried to index the web via the Dewey Decimal System. I had a site laid out similar to Google, where you could browse sites continuously starting from a given call, but the DDS is proprietary, and those people hate anyone who uses their IP without a license. You can Google everyone they’ve shutdown – places that weren’t even libraries – for using anything similar to the DDS. I reached out to the group that manages the DDS, and was taken offline before my project even started.

With all the corporate BS lately, and people looking for alternative options, I thought I’d take a search engine old school, and we’d index like Usenet. Except with an XXX.XXX.XXX format.

My original project used sharded Redis, with append logs to disk. I chose it for its in-memory speed and key-value store. Did some calculations, and I'd have to have millions of records just to consume my entire system's memory.

I had a lot of plans for this before getting shut down.

Now that I'm older, I'm curious if I should be using MongoDB.

What are the benefits and drawbacks of each? Which would you use? And why?

6
submitted 1 week ago by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I started a project around a decade ago to replace Google with the Dewey Decimal System. Academic research showed Google responsible for putting active shooters in echo chambers and feeding them false information, covering up historical events, keeping information away from certain classes of people, etc.

The OCLC is very protective of DDS, and sues anyone who tries to use it (including a library themed party, if memory serves correctly). I reached out to them and pretty much had to shut my project down before it even got off the ground.

I've created a new system, but can't find any of the original YouTube content I included on my original "Why" page.

One of the videos was of Google feeding active shooters racist information and consistently sending them into echo chambers of racist online content. The other was Google hiding historical social contributions from PoC and then outright denying they were doing it -- reported by a watchdog group. I'd also like to include one of how echo chambers formed by algorithms can be a dangerous thing.

I've put several queries into Google and YouTube regarding shooter radicalization through Google, and the content no longer shows up. I've looked for the negatives of using Google, the political influence Google has, and all I'm getting is articles throwing blame somewhere else. It's as if Google went on an active cleanup campaign.

28
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

About a decade ago, I tried to index the web via the Dewey Decimal System. I had a site laid out similar to Google, where you could browse sites continuously starting from a given call, but the DDS is proprietary, and those people hate anyone who uses their IP without a license. You can Google everyone they've shutdown -- places that weren't even libraries -- for using anything similar to the DDS. I reached out to the group that manages the DDS, and was taken offline before my project even started.

With all the corporate BS lately, and people looking for alternative options, I thought I'd take a search engine old school, and we'd index like Usenet. Except with an XXX.XXX.XXX format.

Problem is, now I've got to find categories, sub categories, and local categories. Categories for animals, chat rooms, cars, construction, wrestling, etc.

I need a brilliantly created categorical system with a TLD.MLD.LLD (top level subject domain, mid level domain, and local level domain) format.

I was going to let site owners Disney Land it, by letting them create an index.json file in the root of their site, choosing for themselves where they wanted to appear in the index. Problem is, as trends change and systems become more exact, site owners would have to update their index. Which could become cumbersome.

Further, if we divided into academic disciplines, there would be things like gaming and model construction which wouldn't fit into those.

It would help if there were an already established categorization system, so that site owners didn't have choice anxiety. And then, as the site grew, site owners could recategorize themselves with user feedback.

Could you guys suggest a few categorization systems (can't be DDS), either of your own making or other sources?

I'm already looking at Usenet: https://www.livinginternet.com/u/uw_hier.htm

Edit: Current UX: https://imgur.com/a/sURm4s1

  • Haven't chosen a name yet.
  • Adult is probably going to be dropped, and when the site owner chooses a category, they can put it in the ADT TLD.
49
submitted 1 week ago by ki4jgt@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

When's the last time you saw a car other than red, black, blue, gray, or white on the road?

Like, what happened to all the pinks, purples, oranges, yellows, and greens I remember from the 90s?

view more: next ›

ki4jgt

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 month ago