The site would have a very Google-esque feel. The listings would look similar.
That's the plan. Moderators for categories.
The site would have a very Google-esque feel. The listings would look similar.
That's the plan. Moderators for categories.
Sure.
So, in the US, you're innocent until proven guilty. You cannot be guilty of a crime until you're proven guilty of it. Speeding tickets require a judge to determine guilt.
A lot of US states are making it illegal to be homeless. They're rounding people up and sending them to asylums or work programs. Which means. . . they're being imprisoned without a trial. And. . . If they're given a trial by judge (like with tickets), the crime they're committing is something they couldn't have avoided in the first place.
Pretty much.
It also doesn't catalog individual pages. It lists domains and their descriptions.
As a capitalist, I can stand behind this. Valid criticism.
If corporations are people, and all people are the same under the law...
Well, they'd select the longest workers, with the minimal nutrient requirements, and breed them, lol.
That's because I don't want that.
I remember, as a kid, wandering the local library. Looking at all the books. Seeing the call numbers and author names. Exploring the shelves, as they transitioned from topic to topic to topic.
My idea is to treat the Internet as a giant library, with domains being books on a shelf, and allowing my users to start at a random location, and then peruse the different listings as they transition from slight variations of the main topic.
With all due respect, you don't have the vision, man. To start looking at cultural anthropology, then have a link to a biological anthropology blog 3 lines down? That's the goal. It's not about a narrowed search. It's about cataloging something, so people can go looking for it. To enjoy the hunt.
Yeah, pretty much.
If there were a magic hat that made your life Heaven, while your body worked subconsciously, would you wear it?
I forced Ben Shapiro to change his views on gender with well-thought-out counterpoints.
He was literally saying sex and gender were the same. After a spelled out comment on why they weren't, he changed his tune on the next show.
That sounds about right.
People who feel they have no value, other than their looks, get aggressive when the thing they spent so long working on doesn't pay off.
If you want to be.