this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
534 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

87184 readers
6022 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 49 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (7 children)

Everyone should read before reacting:

This is intended to handle the increase of calls that are related to one incident, so callers get automatically routed to an AI agent who asks if they are calling regarding the incident. If the answer is yes, then callers can receive information or updates, and if it's no, then the callers are transferred to a human.

This makes sense. A big thing happens that you are aware of. Geolocated calls from that area flood in. An operator, who could be getting useful info, has to handle a flood of "Guess what I just saw!"

Note that I think they should spend the money on more operators instead, but at least this seems like it has good guardrails.

[–] teolan@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Except that could be done without AI. Just have a recording that says "we are aware of ... taking place near you, are you calling about this ? “, then answer with yes/no.

No need for bullshit AI.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

My understanding from other articles is caller satisfaction is greater with the TTS system, and it uses voice IVR to triage of they have additional information. AI is not bullshit in and of itself. This product seems barely diffeent from what they provided with APEX.

Recordings also can't auto respond with updates to the caller like this can, which is a pretty nice feature, even if it's just TTS.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

caller satisfaction is greater with the TTS system,

You know what's great about the valley callers who don't make it?

No bad survey results!

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 days ago

My aunt was pissed when she found a hospital satisfaction survey addressed to her mother, a few weeks after her mom died at that hospital.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Can you share articles, interested how design a dynamic IVR to handle unfolding event and update prompts in realtime as new information is added to original incident.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Have you ever met humans? That would be a recipe for “no I’m not calling about that, I want a human” just to get to a human and say you’re calling about exactly that.

[–] Bixcut@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How many operators to handle say 100 calls in 5 minutes? Now imagine the cost to staff a small 911 center to ensure your can handle those calls 24/7. The money doesn't exist.

Butts in seats don't exist right now either. As long as the fancy ivr allows the caller to reach a human with minimal effort, this seems like a scary sounding but neat assistant to a problem without a real solution.

[–] mikesizachrist@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Well it wouldn't cost much cause you'd only need to employ them for a very short amount of time on occasion. Just have a large team of trained staff on call - its just that simple!

[–] Bixcut@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Listen to yourself. Have a large team of trained staff on call. How much do you think that costs? No go on guess. Do some calculations. The people do not exist to fill the seats. The money does not exist to pay the non-existent people. This is an attempt to make an already shitty situation better.

I work in this industry and I read the article. I understand what they are doing. I hate AI but this seems reasonable.

[–] mikesizachrist@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Bixcut@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So did I completely misread your comment? LOL

[–] mikesizachrist@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I feel like i was pretty clearly joking.

[–] Bixcut@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It went over my head. Sorry. Everything is not the onion these days.

[–] mikesizachrist@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Idk what bulb vegetables have to do with this. We're discussing AI use by the New Orleans Police

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

So, say a tower block fire happens at 2 am. You're getting 50 calls a minute, 20% from residents and the rest from people calling to say they see a fire.

How long would it take for your trained staff to spring into action compared to an on demand AI? And are you paying your on-call staff to wait, or only when they're on the phone?

edit: I'm thinking about the Grenfell Towers. I listened to the BBC's coverage of the enquiry, and it was rough. Gave me a new appreciation for what emergency responders do.

[–] Chaf@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You don't need AI for that. Automated phone answering systems do exist, and can redirect people.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This is basically a beefed up IVR with better customer satisfaction reports, so.. yes.

But as I said in the other comment, giving updates to callers is something a standard answering system can't do.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Even assuming perfect conditions - where the caller very clearly states what's happening and the AI agent understands everything properly - this is a waste of resources. Just hire more operators dawg. It's really not that complicated.

And then think about what happens outside of those perfect conditions. So pretty much most calls.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago

Just hire more operators dawg. It's really not that complicated.

Have offered your recruiting skills/services to them? The nationwide 911 operator/dispatcher shortage has been a problem for years, so if you find it easy or uncomplicated to recruit them, then your services might be very valuable.

(Yes, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here by assuming that that was an informed opinion.)

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And if someone tries to call with new unreported information about an already reported incident? Decision tree or geolocation routes caller to recorded information. No way of knowing if information is important or not without talking to the caller first. Possible downside is far greater than possible benefits.

Edit Multiple calls about shots in neighborhood, if victim is last to call are they forced to listen to an update before triage allows transfer? No sir I don't like it.

Maybe this is an improvement in this location, but as many have said a staffing issue.

Functional societies have costs, often those costs are far less than dysfunctional societies.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wish this were pinned at the top. It seems like almost nobody reads beyond the headline.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

This is one of the few actually cool and useful implementariins to me. It reminds me of my work writing systems to detect antimicrobial issues in hospitals.

A shame it's getting so much hate, but they did choose to brand with "AI" so they get what they ask for.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Joe's Apartment, the 911 call center be like