183

And that's a pretty big hatchback.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Why don't we all start keying these things? They are murder machines designed to kill children or frail people in a low speed pedestrian collision with their high hoods, if people want that luxury I should be able to key their truck.

Everybody thinks a high front hood looks cool, the reason the rest of us don't buy vehicles like this is because we are adults and don't make stupid decisions that will end up with children dying simply because of our aesthetic desires and need to perform our gender.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 42 points 6 days ago

Why don’t we all start keying these things?

or, use government to pass laws to restrict the size of vehicles used for non commercial purposes.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago

that's a lovely dream

[-] jrwperformance@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

We just need a weight based vehicle registration. The more your apartment building on wheels weighs, the more you have to pay to keep it legal for road use. The tax is justified as well. Heavier vehicles cause more road wear/tear.

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That would penalize EVs, which I suppose is fair if you're trying to account for wear and tear on the road.

Though I have thought a lot about something like this for Montreal. Currently, our parking vignettes are priced according to your vehicle's engine size.

This leads to funny situations where a Mazda 3 with a 2.5L Skyactiv engine is getting absolutely fucked while a big ass 2.0T SUV is paying less in vignette fees.

I went from an Elantra with a 2.0L engine to a K4 with a 1.6T engine, and my sportier K4 costs me less in vignette fees than my slow Elantra. The reasoning is that the SAAQ only exposes the engine size on the registration papers rather than the dimensions and weight of the vehicle, but I still think it's stupid.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

Not all EVs are heavy, just the SUV tanks they sell in NA.

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago

EVs are generally heavier than their ICE counterparts due to their battery pack. Energy density isn't something EVs beat ICE on yet.

[-] jrwperformance@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

It's about vehicle weight. Drivetrain type dosnt matter.

[-] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 6 days ago

It only penalises EVs if you do it instead of, rather than in addition to a petrol excise. If there's an excise that forces ICE vehicles to pay for their pollution, that would more than offset any extra rego cost related to road damage.

[-] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That would penalize EVs

The difference in weight isn't as large as between an SUV and a sedan, and EVs should already get subsidies/tax-advantages based on pollution which should more than make up for it.

[-] Jiral@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

There is nothing preventing having slightly different weight classes for ICE and EVs. The latter shouldn't get a free pass but battery weight should be considered. In Some country that is already the case that EVs have slightly different weight based rules.

[-] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago

Not just weight, but also energy usage per 100 km & size.

Tax loopholes like leasing for "company work" need to be closed as well.

[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

Well yeah that would be preferable definitely!

[-] officermike@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Best we can do is create back-asswards EPA fuel economy regulations that end up encouraging manufacturers to make ever-larger trucks instead of more fuel efficient trucks.

[-] CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

As someone who likes to do my own car maintenance, those high hoods look like hell. I’m average height and I’d probably need a damn stepladder to change the oil.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 days ago

Stepladders are now common in service centres.

There is no engineering reason those hoods have to be so high. Buyers like the road intimidation effect that screams, PAYLOAD. HURRRRRR.

[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It is also funny when people lift their work trucks, landscapers do this a lot.

I will always have a memory of me at the dump with a tiny 90s toyota pickup bed full of heavy brush wrestling with it next to a landscaper with a lifted dodge ram who was doing the same thing but every single thing they lifted they had to reach up and into the bed of their truck as opposed to me where I just picked the awkward bundles of brush up at a comfortable waist level....

I will never not find it hilarious that bros are always lifting their trucks to go offroad too and yet in terms of offroad capability the most important thing for clearance is the differentials ("pumpkins") on the axles which can get easily smashed... and lifting your truck doesn't change the height of those....

So now your allignment is probably fucked, who knows how breaking mechanics have changed at highway speed!? your suspension is no longer set up for the vehicle you have because you changed it.... and you have taken a machine thousands of people very carefully set up to make it work nicely together and jacked a random variable way off that erases all of that and messes with systems in the vehicle you can't even begin to predict off the top of your head.

edit oh yeah and the single most important thing about technical offroading beyond the basic requirements in suspension and drivetrain is the length of the wheelbase of the vehicle, long wheelbase vehicles are fundamentally severely limited offroad because they constantly bottom out, so modern large pickup trucks fail atrociously at the offroad step on design principles alone. A short wheelbase 2 door jeep wrangler is infinitely superior offroad to a long wheelbase pickup.

[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It also makes it so if you hit an old lady at 17mph the hood hits her in the upper chest or head and kills her instantly vs. a normal car that would hit her at the waist non-fatally and scoop her up unto the hood.

I am so tired of people driving these murder machines, they also tend to speed in them and these are the absolute worst vehicles to speed in both for the survival of the driver (some of these trucks like Ford F250s, the roof was made super light to reduce rollover risk in safety tests which means the roof doesn't survive rollovers) and everyone else around them.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago

literally this weekend I saw an accident where a tiny Karen in a lifted F150 hit a cement curb of boulevard at 60km/hr, ripping off the front suspension. I was first on scene, she said she didn't see the boulevard.

I'm sure she'll sort it out with the road's manager.

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

Oh yeah I can't imagine how difficult maintenance would be with such a tall engine bay. I also like to do my own maintenance, very easy on a car like mine.

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I like your line of thinking. Work truck should look like a work truck. Worn.

The driver probably wouldn't even be able to see my K4 in traffic to the right of him, let alone a bicycle, or 18 children sitting in a row in front of the hood.

I very specifically got a hatchback / wagon because I wanted cargo space and pedestrian safety. Not that I intend to hit pedestrians, but we also don't have airbags with the intention to get into a collision.

Also, the designer of the Dodge Ram, the truck that arguably started this trend, stated that he wanted the truck to look like a fist moving through the air. Uh, yup, that is indeed what that is, a weapon.

[-] crenquis@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago

Over 13 years ago, before the hoods were quite this high, I had a pickup truck roll into the back of my car because he couldn't see me (was coming out of "Event" parking, so barely moving).

[-] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago

Dude, some of us need trucks, like actually hauling loads around several times a week, and it fucking sucks that there isn’t any choice in the design currently. Don’t key some poor souls car who’s just trying to make do with what’s available. Slate and Telo might actually save us here. I really can’t wait to “downgrade” to a Telo. I just hope they actually make it to market and succeed.

[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

I know that and yet paradoxically this is literally what everyone who owns a pickup truck says.

[-] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

We’ll see how many of us put our money where our mouth is when actual smaller options hit the market. Both Slate and Telo are about to actually start delivery, maybe. Won’t believe it till I see it.

[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Sure and honestly there are obviously reasons for a large pickup especially because the market is dumb as hell but also...

  1. The high hood is murderous and pointless from a utility perspective, which is fundamentally contradictory to the concept of the vehicle as a utility focused vehicle.

  2. The crash ratings for the back seats in many older pickups are not safe for kids, there is a reason SUVs have a longer passenger compartment size....

  3. These vehicles put everyone in danger around them, including the passengers because even with the miracles of modern brake technology they can't stop fast on slippery conditions and they cannot swerve at high speed without going out of control or rolling over leaving your only option to smash into thing and hope you kill it more than it kills you... my point is even when these vehicles have a function they still involve an individual placing everyone around them in danger through their use.

Compare an american pickup hood to the hood of this utility van, the hood of this van still has to go up very quickly to eventually reach the roof line but even still you can see it was thoughtfully designed to maximize visibility while also making the most likely pedestrian collision one where the person is hit lowdown and falls onto the hood rather than under the vehicle.

This one is better, of course the "problem" is that it doesn't look like a RAM because... it was designed purposefully to be a BAD battering ram???

Even still that hood shape still doesn't gurantee a pedestrian strike couldn't happen higher up on the head or upper chest. This is the entire reason for the sedan like pronounced nose in the first place right??!?

All pickup truck designers did was look at that and think "yeah but that looks lame, we need to raise the hood more" until they made another vertical wall that the driver now can't see over..... it is so dumb it makes my head hurt.

https://alexandriainjuryattorney.com/blog/pick-up-truck-blind-spots/

This article about blindspots is a good visual example of the problem in that they are both expressions of the same fundamental geometric stupidity of american pickup truck hoods, the same reason the make it easy to run over kids by accident makes them more likely to kill them on contact in an accident that might otherwise have been totally survivable. It is pretty hard to lethally impact someone in their lower body, it is frighteningly easy to lethally impact someone in the head or their upper chest.

vans don't do quite as well at going over trenches, and don't look like they have places to put straps/chains to drag things with

[-] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

several times a week

Bold claim, most do it only a few times a year, at which point it's easier to rent one of those things to attach. And for parking, a smaller one would be easier if you did it often. But that's my view...

there isn't any choice

There is. Have you heard of kei trucks and lorries? (They're not mini, just normally sized, unlike the two brands you mentioned). Pretty practical; their "bed" is the same size, and they actually are made to transport that stuff.

If you prefer a different car look, an estate car or one of those coupé utilities like the Volkswagen Caddy might work.

For frequent large work burdens, a van is much better and actually keeps the wares dry. Or, let it be delivered by a transport company if you're ordering.

also

don't key some poor soul's car

Those genital compensation vehicles (or copecars for short) cost like $80,000 up to $400,000(!). They're a colossal waste of time, space, and money.

If you want something that actually saves you and makes you stronger while using, just go buy a proper bicycle and if you need something transported that people can't do on bikes, then use a van or lorry as I mentioned.

[-] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 2 points 6 days ago

I just want my 1999 Frontier back, with an EV engine in it. Why is this so hard? Why is the current Frontier the same size as the original Titan?

[-] seathru@quokk.au 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Why don’t we all start keying these things? They are murder machines

Because (at least in the US) their owners are also murder machines. So you'd have to be pretty committed to your cause.

[-] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

Nah they are infuriatingly normal people who are being allowed to think their choice of driving a massive pickup is normal or acceptable.

Everyone thinks they need them.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

Even in Canada, those mfs can be insane.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
183 points (93.0% liked)

196

7165 readers
2601 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS