[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Anything Fortnine is worth a watch.

However, taking a motorcycle with such limited range and only L2-charging is just asking for pain.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Turing Test is fundamentally based on fooling humans. Not sure it's smart to pin humankind's future on what a birthday magician can do.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Most TVs support both Infrared (IR) and Bluetooth. Just get an IR remote and take the battery out of the old one. I just got a basic IR-only one for an LG TV for $6. Works like a charm.

94
[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

One of the fun things about this latest cycle of AI is how the goalposts move. Not the 'AGI in six months' one. That might as well be mounted on top of a golf cart with a brick laid on the accelerator. But the one that talks about the Total Addressable Market (TAM) and goals of a product.

One of the things they tell people pitching VCs is that you should be addressing a reasonably big TAM (potential customers) and have sensibly large, yet attainable stakes. With AI, though, the TAM was always questionable. Who would want or pay for a chatty 'bot,' especially one that 'hallucinated' answers? So they pivoted to change the TAM and the stakes. Your personal assistant. No? Therapist? No. Project Manager? Teacher? Still no?

What we have now is a constant churning of THOSE goals. Now, the TAM is pretty much the whole world, and the stakes are either massive unemployment, widescale industrial shutdown, or destruction of the human race. It's all getting silly. Once you've extracted all the investment money you can by maxing out the stakes and scaring the pants off people, there's not much higher to go.

Meanwhile, all your actual income is coming from pedestrian applications, like summarizing emails, screening job applicants, or coding assistants. There's just not enough revenue to cover all the costs you're incurring to get it to hallucinate a little less. So you have to pump up the stakes. Next up: setting off all the nukes! Shutting down the sun and the moon! Inviting alien colonists!

Speaking of going bigger: https://youtu.be/R8SeysuMpA0

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago
  • Midvale school for the gifted.
  • First pants, THEN your shoes.
  • Blah, blah, Ginger, Ginger, Ginger.
  • Boneless chicken ranch.
[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago
[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Hexadecimal base (cracking knuckles).

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

CompuServe's first big mistake was NOT sending a billion floppy disks and CDs to every household in the country. Who would be crazy enough to do that?

Their second mistake was missing out on Hollywood.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A few points:

  • "I have nothing to hide," means you've accepted the premise that the burden of innocence is on you. That you are guilty until proven innocent. There are a couple millenia of jurisprudence, saying 'innocent until proven guilty' should be the default. The US 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments get close, but they don't just come out and say it.

  • "If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." This has been attributed to a few people from Cardinal Richelieu to Voltaire. But the crux is, anyone can make someone appear guilty. Doesn't matter if you're innocent. The burden of proof has to be on the accuser, otherwise it's down to chaos, and tyrrany of the powerful and the mob.

  • Personal privacy by default is one of those fundamental rights that gives us control of a lot of things around us. From freely walking down the street, to our shopping habits, license-plate-readers, location-tracking, who we associate with, and our healthcare.

  • Imagine if the rules were changed so any time anyone wanted to use our data, including transactions, web and mobile interactions, credit-card, banking, voting, healthcare, whatever... they had to get explicit, single-use permission. How much weight would be lifted from everyone's shoulder. It means you, the individual are in charge.

  • There's academic data on the psychological effects of surveillance. It has actual effect on one's behavior and mental health: https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2024/1/niae039/7920510

  • At this point, there are too many privacy leaks. The only reasonable solution is to flip it all on its head. EVERYTHING is private, unless there is a legitimate reason to pierce that veil, and the burden is on those wanting the data.

It'll have financial impacts on many business models. Yes, and? Do better.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

Not sure about the older LG models, but in the newer ones, the wifi and bluetooth or on the same board. Cutting off the module means the remote stops working.

Personally, I've isolated and blocked the network, factory reset the TV, and set it up to power off when not in use. It only gets content from an ancient AppleTV box.

I paid and own the glass. They can go screw themselves.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

AI software can't technically kill you unless:

  1. It convinces someone who can kill you, to you know, kill you.
  2. It gets access to the physical world, which can definitely kill you.

Oh, wait.

  1. U.S. military is using AI to help plan Iran air attacks: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/us-military-using-ai-help-plan-iran-air-attacks-sources-say-lawmakers-rcna262150
  2. Anthropic Previewing the Model Hardware Standard: https://www.anthropic.com/news/model-hardware-standard-research-preview

See, nothing to worry about.

132
submitted 1 week ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
5
submitted 1 week ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
31
Just be honest (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

The OpenSauce privacy statement is a work of art.

32

One of the best DefCon talks ever. May go down as a classic.

239
submitted 3 weeks ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
132
submitted 3 weeks ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
26
69
submitted 1 month ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
304
99
submitted 1 month ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
2
submitted 1 month ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/soccer@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

fubarx

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago