719
My poker face sucks (lemmy.nz)
submitted 5 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 209 points 5 months ago

I don't know how to not be this person.

Everybody else is wrong. A meeting is for back and forth communication. If they didn't want a meeting, they shouldn't have scheduled a meeting. Just write a memo or something. Everybody has far too many meetings anyways, and you're an asshole if you waste everybody's time on extra meetings that aren't even meetings.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 94 points 5 months ago

Yeah seriously, body communication is still communication, this host just doesn’t want negative feedback.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Is the best part of, no it’s the only real reason, for in person meetings

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 48 points 5 months ago

100% agree with this.

If you don't want feedback, make your shit meeting an email. Otherwise it's a self-aggrandizement ego soothing cheerleading session.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 37 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Had a manager once who told everyone to turn on their cams so he would "know that they were paying full attention." Heaven forbid you treat your team like professionals instead of 3rd graders!

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 9 points 5 months ago

I work from home and look like a homeless person during the week. I only shave before the monthly on camera meeting.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago

I mean in fairness I'm often not listening, but that's only in "could have been an email" style meetings.

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Goated

[-] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 62 points 5 months ago

Sounds like this person just won the lottery. Apparently some people absolutely need to see the person that they are talking to, but I personally hate when my job has meetings and we have to have our cameras on. I don't need to see you. Just say what needs said or show whatever on your screen and then let's move on with the day.

[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 40 points 5 months ago

I've taken to putting clear tape or a little vaseline on the lense.

Everyone sees me, but the image is imperfect. I just say there's something wrong with my camera.

I'm slowly making it worse, so they get used to bad/no image.

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago

Gonna get an email from IT saying they are sending you an external camera to use because the boss can't peep at you.

[-] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Do the same thing to that camera

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

And then they will request it back to inspect it. You really can't win, best thing is to just do some wild makeup that is distracting. Maybe some black eyes and gashes. It's none of their damn business what I do on my own time.

[-] jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 5 months ago

They ask to inspect it, take the tape off and give it to them. They hand it back, put the tape back on.

Weird, it only happens on my computer....

[-] rainwall@piefed.social 4 points 5 months ago

Very light sandpaper, like 320. Just a couple of passes.

It will make the glass grainy, and there is no real evidence you did anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 5 months ago

Lol, there have to know there's a problem, and I'm not telling them.

IT isn't that proactive - I would know, I'm part of it. We don't have time for stuff people do report - we're not going out looking for stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago

I don't mind screen on, but I'm unapologetic in the vibes I give off

[-] Strider@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's also such a neurotypical thing to (want to) force people to have the camera on.

Some people work better without at times.

Just let them work however they want and show trust, it might just benefit everyone. If I am not focused on showing an expectation of a facial expression I can focus on the topic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 49 points 5 months ago

Maybe miming that "jerkoff" motion while rolling your eyes was a bit much

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 38 points 5 months ago

Sounds like they don't want this person in the conversation, if they don't want to hear them, see them or know what they think.

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago

Yet, you are forced to work with these kind of people.

Forced is a key word: we are cattle.

I'd call the solution men going their own way, if the Incels didn't do it first.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 36 points 5 months ago

If you want my opinion, be prepared to get criticized if whatever you presenting sucks ass. If you don't want it, stop inviting me to meetings and send an email. It's really not that hard.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah where I work some of the managers get really upset if you criticise them even if their ideas are stupid. If you go on Glassdoor look the company up everyone complains about it so it's pretty bad.

When they have these meetings to "discuss" an idea really what they want to do is just have an audience to announce it to. I always claim to be busy so I never attend these meetings anymore.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 5 points 5 months ago

"Could you please wank your ego somewhere else? That would be nice. Thank you."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

Inviting only people who support and agree with you to a meeting seems like a great way to run a company.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago

It depends on what the meeting is. There are situations where you might not agree with decisions being made, but undermining your superior infront of business partners is not ok.

Those are the kinds of problems you handle privately. Not in a meeting with other people from other companies.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

While I agree, I also think most such meetings can be held between those superiors just fine

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

There might be questions asked. And then you need the appropriate head of department to answer it. That's why they're there while not being expected to say anything.

I've had to implement systems I did not like. Systems I thought were inferior to other methods. But when the decision is made, it's made. And when asked how we plan to implement it, I answer with the plan and the steps. I don't undermine us by expressing disapproval in the formal meeting.

It's called professionalism.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago

Yep and now you are committed to something you didn't want to be committed to because you couldn't say anything in the meeting.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 5 points 5 months ago

You always talk before a meeting to decide what is going to be decided in the meeting.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago

That is assuming you have sane environment and processes, which is a bold assumption for a lot of people

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

You were probably already committed to it long before the meeting started.

Time for objections and concerns have already passed

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 24 points 5 months ago

During our last meeting (where inexplicably 25 people where called to talk), my direct manager had to take a shit. He told my colleague who was sitting opposite of me to excuse him, should he be called while on the toilet (the order was random).

Unsurprisingly, just as he had left, it was his turn. Despite being muted and had no video on, everyone heard me laugh because it was so loud my colleague’s mic picked it up.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Say smarter things if you want more positive responses.

[-] eodur@piefed.social 5 points 5 months ago

Found my new email tag line

[-] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 20 points 5 months ago

I just watched this GQ interview with Sacha Baron Cohen where he says:

In the real world, real people perform like bad actors. Like soap actors.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 5 months ago

I thought being able to see reactions is exactly why people are supposed to keep cameras on???

[-] Demdaru@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

But not theirs. xD

[-] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How bad can it be?

trumpface. gif

[-] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 14 points 5 months ago

I don't use Zoom, Teams, etc. But I've seen quite a few posts that suggest people hosting the meetings have to ask others to mute themselves or turn off their cameras. Do the people hosting meetings not have the ability to mute the people joining them? Sounds like a no brainer to have that feature.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago

They do have that feature. The hosts are just ignorant of it.

[-] starchylemming@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

every single video conference application I've used has these features

they are always self explanatory and easy to use too

[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 months ago

It's kind of a courtesy. Just muting somebody is a bit rude

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 5 months ago

The private slack channel I was in with others who had my role would always point out when I started looking angry and annoyed. Heh heh. I hated meetings at that company.

[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

Whelp, if you can see what I'm thinking on my face, I guess I might as well say it out loud.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

I think you should leave

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

We're all trying to find the guy who did this

[-] RAFAELRAMIREZ@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Some of us just don’t have an indoor voice… on our face.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
719 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

12065 readers
3508 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ReadyUser31@lemmy.world
aeronmelon@lemmy.world
needanke@feddit.org