363
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/historymemes@piefed.social
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] PugJesus@piefed.social 50 points 3 months ago

There were, unfortunately, much worse outcomes than that which were possible.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 41 points 3 months ago

"A man in Austria was rejected from art school, one thing led to another, and America dropped two nuclear weapons on the sovereign nation of Japan." - Brian Regan

[-] iocase@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago

And you can thank those two portable suns for giving us anime and hentai

[-] natecox@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago

The big yellow one is the sun.

[-] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 14 points 3 months ago

Calm down there, Copernicus

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

Pick me! Pick Me! I have ideas.

not very good ones, I'm afraid, but I can at least make sure Trump can't hurt any more kids.

[-] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 23 points 3 months ago

Keeping Trump from harming kids is a very good idea, so you've contradicted yourself already - like a true politician!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

So you want to see Trump in prison, but strapped to a cam show where tips cause various electrodes to, you know, zap him?

Electrodes in very awkward places?

Tips go to helping all the people he hates most, of course.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago

Today we'll be debating the moral calculus of President FuglyDuck's initiative to explode all children.

[-] janus2@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago

oh shit the extreme environmentalists are on their side already

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

environmentalist

Ecofascists*

[-] vrek@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

I mean I know where I stand I on that but I'm willing to listen to arguments why we shouldn't explode all children...

[-] Starik@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Conservatives have no respect for expertise.

It’s easy to assume something you have no clue about must be easy and anyone could do it. If you’re dumb and lack imagination, that is. I’d like to nominate a random farmer from Iowa to pilot Harrison Smith’s next plane ride.

[-] spacegoat@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

If I see a cross in your username, your opinion goes straight in the trash

[-] xylogx@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

And he was so horrified at the results that he created the doctrine of civilian control of nuclear weapons.

[-] PugJesus@piefed.social 12 points 3 months ago

"The buck stops here"

Truman had many faults, flaws, and mistakes. But he still ranks as one of our best presidents.

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org -3 points 3 months ago

I'm waiting for the downside?

[-] PugJesus@piefed.social 18 points 3 months ago

Probably the civilian deaths.

[-] protist@retrofed.com 13 points 3 months ago

Yeah it seems pretty clear civilian deaths were coming regardless, whether through sustained aerial assault and ground invasion or two nukes. Which choice was less bad is something we can only speculate about

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

We are still using the surplus of Purple Heart medals we made in WWII in anticipation of a ground invasion of Japan. Food for thought.

[-] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

I think we're just now using up the last of them.

[-] Nautalax@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

There were way more civilian deaths from the war continuing than from the use of the atom bombs that helped convince the Japanese government to throw in the towel (aside from the parts of it that stubbornly attempted a failed coup to keep the war going, anyway). The Japanese occupation at the time of the atom bombing stretched from eastern China out to Indonesia and was quite brutal to say the least with many millions of civilians killed.

[-] UntimedDiffusion@piefed.zip 6 points 3 months ago

Do you mean of putting one guy in power or nuking Japan?

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 3 months ago

Well look what they were doing to POW's or how they surprise attacked us first.

[-] PugJesus@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago

That's not a justification.

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

so war crimes allow further crimes? we had no actual need to nuke them. let alone civilians. let alone twice. they were already going toward a surrender. but hey he knew the cold was was next, so to speak, so we might as well vaporize a few civilians to show russia we’re capable?

[-] PugJesus@piefed.social 12 points 3 months ago
  1. The targets were chosen for their military value.

  2. Internal US discussions at the time show that the US did not believe Japan was heading towards a surrender, and projected immense casualties from either of the other two options (invasion, blockade) to end the war. For that matter, Japan was not 'going toward a surrender' except insofar as their 'surrender' offers included "We keep our brutal colonial empire, otherwise we will fight to the end." Japan was training fucking schoolchildren to become suicide bombers in preparation for a US invasion at that time. That's not 'going toward a surrender'.

[-] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

Always nice when I think a user is a fuck and upon investigating I find them in a losing argument with you

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
363 points (99.7% liked)

History Memes

2955 readers
94 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

  6. Avoid posting AI-generated content whenever possible.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS