this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
700 points (99.6% liked)

Political Memes

12345 readers
3518 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jenings@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

My algo served me a video recently about how he’s the lefts trump and it makes sense.

People went from not taking him seriously to establishment quickly trying to take him out while the populace loves him while remaining popular with his base

To top it off it seems unlikely he’s a serial child rapist who will take every single opportunity to make a buck

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

This is the same Wall Street Journal that is owned by NewsCorp? The multimedia company operated by Rupert Murdoch as a propaganda machine for right wing fascist policy and heavily tried to influence government to favor the ultra wealthy and hive them power. That Wall Street Journal?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 16 points 21 hours ago

Sub 50k Beats Trump by 31 points

100k+ beats Trump by 38 points

Isn't there someone else in the room you are forgetting to ask?

1,000,000,000+ currently planning the municipal level sequel to the business plot.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 17 points 21 hours ago

Ah, so they are now in the committed and loving stage of the relationship.

Understandable actually that MAGA and the GOP would have no fucking clue what that's about.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 18 points 22 hours ago

Good, the honeymoon is over. Mamdani's actions as mayor are no longer shocking, they are business as usual. Now the MAGAs and the Corpo-Establishment Dems can just stand there, while he makes them look like fools as he defies their predictions of a Socialist hell hole.

A recent poll that showed that 30% of Dems now identify as Democratic Socialists. That was about two weeks ago. I'll bet its even higher now. This is the wave of the future of the Democratic Party. They better get on, or they'll be left behind.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The establishment in 'Murica are genuinely terrified of his success

If he shows that it's possible, then they're afraid that other places will want the same

When' Muricans travel and actually experience what it's like to live somewhere else, the smart few start making plans for their escape to the civilised world

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 15 points 1 day ago

They've bombed, blockaded and invaded other countries for less.

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the smart few start making plans for their escape to the civilised world

If by "the smart few" you mean highly sort after professionals, such as PHDs. We're often seeing the opposite, a majority of them seek locations at which they'll get the highest pay - Which tends to be USA, due to the exploitation of everyone beneath them

[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Except we have lost more than 10,000 STEM PhDs from federal departments since Trump entered office, outnumbering new hires 11 to 1 (https://www.science.org/content/article/u-s-government-has-lost-more-10-000-stem-ph-d-s-trump-took-office)

And 15% less PhD applicants, 21% less of foreign PhD applicants (https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/losing-an-entire-generation-of-scientific-talent-top-us-universities-accepted-15-fewer-phds/4023877.article)

Usually people come here for work when trained at that level, but we are quickly heading towards a "brain drain" of losing our highly educated population.

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Except we have lost more than 10,000 STEM PhDs from federal departments since Trump entered office

And where did they go? Silicon Valley, Europe or China? This doesn't necessarily mean the US has less PHDs available.

And 15% less PhD applicants, 21% less of foreign PhD applicants

We can hope the 21% drop of foreign applicants for PHD programmes, is reflecting the job market. But I've not seen any data suggesting Silicon Valley having bigger trouble than usually attracting talent when flying million dollar a year contracts in their faces.

OpenAI, Google, Meta and all the other jazz is still attracting the talent. Unfortunately.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This doesn’t necessarily mean the US has less PHDs available

It actually does. That's how math works. If you have X - 10,000, your result is less than X

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 1 points 16 hours ago

That's just one employer, not all American employers.

[–] starik@lemmy.today 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Selectively leaving out 50k-100k income, aka the middle class. Hmm…

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago

Its NYC I'm pretty sure 100k is middle class there. Lower middle class.

[–] LazyBaby@lemmy.zip 372 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Honeymoon phase OVER!! Stable, long term relationship phase built on mutual respect has STARTED.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 85 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Beat me to it. No longer are they dreaming of what things will look like, they are seeing the results and the reality of what it looks like to have someone actually care about their well being. May we all be so lucky, honestly.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Could you imagine if we got used to that? Started to expect functional government? It’s so refreshing to have even one decent example. I want it so bad.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'd like to call for a vote for the following motion:

LazyBaby to be renamed BasedBaby.

[–] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I vote FOR the motion.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

The best part of the relationship comes after the honeymoon phase ends, when the initial excitement and passion gives way to comfort, familiarity, and long-term stability.

But I don't expect right-wingers to understand that. They're kinda hedonic and self-centered, for all their talk of "family values"...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (4 children)

He accomplished more good in a few months than trump did in almost 6 years. I also haven't heard him constantly blame the last guy for all his failings. +1 for this new mayor!!

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

He accomplished more than basically any politician in the last 20 years in the us.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd say WSJ is captured but it never really was un-captured.

It has gone total MAGA since Trump 1.0 though.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

WSJ is Murdoch owned. Purchased in 2007. Hasn't "gone" anything, it's fucked pre trump

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 4 points 1 day ago

Murdoch media created Trump

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

The last time I took WSJ seriously was before 2007.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 108 points 1 day ago (2 children)

WSJ is so desperate to be relevant again they are straight up printing obvious lies.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 day ago

It is the Murdock way

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

WSJ editorial board are basically an anti-progress FUD campaign committee and always have been. They spent the entirety of Bill de Blasio's (Second best NYC mayor in my life) double term desperately trying to tear him down, too. They're also the origin of the term "bike lobby" or more specifically "The all-powerful bike lobby" in reference to an imaginary and shady organization supposedly responsible for getting share bikes and bike lanes onto the street. WSJ is a rag.

WSJ has a bad case of MDS: Mamdani Derangement Syndrome

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And since The Constitution says Trump can't run again, it doesn't matter that The Constitution says Mamdani can't run either!

I would vote for Mamdani for president.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Non-american here, why wouldn't Mamdani not be able to run for president?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Gotta be born American.

Like, there's been debate about children of US military born overseas, even in a US military base which is for all intents legally American soil.

Edit:

And to clarify, Mamdani ain't trying to change that

People just started saying it.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

children of US military born overseas

The debate about what natural-born means has often been confusing to me.

The USA does both, Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis to determine citizen status at birth. But when it's about eligibility for president, suddenly extra weight should be put on Jus Soli being the only real proper form of citizenship? That makes no sense to me.

I thought natural-born would mean citizen at birth, not immigrated and naturalized. To avoid situations where for example some English noble immigrates and naturalizes in name only, uses his wealth to gain political power, and then puts the US back under English influence. It makes sense to me that the founders of a new republic would want to avoid having it twisted by former masters.

[–] Frikisada@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You mean Boris Johnson?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] raglan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

IIRC, can't be a naturalized citizen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How odd for a Murdoch sewer rag to go after a progressive politician who’s running their town.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] el_twitto@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

WSJ can suck my salty balls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The sexiest percent favorability. Nice!

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

I've always liked the CSJ (Canal Street Journal) better.

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s not time enough for traditional measurements of a political “honeymoon”…

To clarify, “honeymoon” is NOT a measure of accomplishment; “honeymoon” is a period of possibly effective influence.

The “presidential honeymoon” is the first year of every presidential admin, representing the best time to push forward initiatives before the next 2 year congressional elections can push back…

It’s not an issue of power so much as assumption of such, this article is pretty much unnecessary.

What do you mean it’s over?! We are just getting started

[–] djsiete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Americans need people like him. I've hated hard on yanks but he goes to show that there is hope for you, after all

load more comments
view more: next ›