Someone should mail all the postmasters and the inspectors a letter reminding them that the concept of qualified immunity doesn't belong to them, that dear leader probably can't even remember who the current postmaster general even is without being told, and that they are not insulated from the finding out.
There will be so many lawsuits over purposely caused issues and other crises by November, the court will cancel it all and maga will say it's just like Zelenskyy did so it's fine. Two months to see if wrong!
If we're not facing an active, actual, missiles-in-the-air, tanks-on-the-border invasion and they try to pull that shit, then they're even dumber than I thought.
The War with Canada (Special Military Operation) will provide the necessary justification
States operate elections. States decide what is a valid or invalid ballot. USPS is not a state.
This isn't about how States conduct their elections. Each state can have mail-in voting, there's nothing stopping them from conducting their elections that way. The problem, which this is all about, is that the States rely on a federal service to do the delivering of the ballots part, which is what is getting fucked about with.
Is there any way states could do something to obscure what is being sent, I wonder?
In the worst case, maybe they use library systems to get ballots as close to citizens as possible. Or offer a way to walk in to your nearest state government building and get one to fill out and drop off later.
My largest concern here in Colorado is that we still have a way to do it at our leisure and that there is a huge window of time to exercise the picking up (if required) and the dropping off. Preferably many weeks.
That's how it's supposed to be. Unfortunately, that is not how it is right now. To even try to restore those states rights, will take the courts. And even if the courts are willing to do their jobs properly, the process would take years and we'd be lucky to see it resolved before the 2028 elections.
This is Trump's modus operandi. Fuck shit up and when the courts try to sort it out, drag things out as long as possible so that by the time a decision is made, you've already done whatever you wanted to do in the first place.
Bottom line. Don't vote by mail because your vote will not be counted that way.
Edit to clarify their plan:
When election officials bring ballots to their USPS site for delivery, either the entire batch of ballot envelopes or a sampling will be physically scanned – depending on where the ballots are being dropped, according to the whistleblower. If just a single ballot envelope scan does not align with the information in the portal, USPS will refuse to deliver the entire batch of ballots while the discrepancy is being sorted out.
When you request a ballot for mail in voting, election officials mail it to you. The USPS plan is the hold up ballots before they are delivered to voters. If even one ballot is addressed to a voter/address that doesn't exactly match the USPS list of allowed voters, then the whole batch will be held up until they sort out the error. That sorting out will not doubt not be completed in time for you to get your ballot and fill it out.
Don't mail your ballot back. Do vote by mail, and hand deliver your ballot to an official ballot drop box.
No. That is not a solution. The USPS plan is to not deliver your ballot to you when you request it.
When election officials bring ballots to their USPS site for delivery , either the entire batch of ballot envelopes or a sampling will be physically scanned – depending on where the ballots are being dropped, according to the whistleblower. If just a single ballot envelope scan does not align with the information in the portal, USPS will refuse to deliver the entire batch of ballots while the discrepancy is being sorted out.
Emphasis mine. You can request a ballot, but there is every possibility that the ballot will never be delivered for you to fill out. Early voting is going to be a much more reliable way to insure that your vote has a chance of being counted.
That's why in CA, OR, and WA you can print out your ballot yourself. Fuck DeJoy with a rusty crowbar.
Any idea what the plans are in Colorado? Yeah, printing it out would be the best option.
Still get to fill it out at my leisure and drop off at my leisure, with no concern for harassment by some Marklar douche or their ICE buddies. No lines. No stress trying to remember what to fill out or take a crib sheet, etc.
Also - very convenient and I love telling the Marklars in other states that Colorado has been voting by mail for a very long time and I never stand in lines. They hate to hear it. They want voting to be a chore, especially for people that live in the "wrong" areas. :)
Nope, sorry. I only know about CA as a resident, and the other two because I've seen them talking about it.
Holy shit thank you for pointing that out. I’d personally recommend swapping out the rusty crowbar for rusty barbed wire, but that’s just me.
The Democratic Party needs to be broadcasting that option from the hilltops.
When it comes to Colorado, so far, it doesn't seem like we have the option. At least not yet. They did give us an additional SEVEN days for voting, because everyone can see what kind of fuckery donnie and the cons are up to.
https://www.denverpost.com/2026/06/02/colorado-elections-voting-jared-polis-law-trump/
Starting in November, Colorado voters will get an extra week to receive and return their mail-in ballots under new legislation signed by Gov. Jared Polis that also takes steps to insulate the state from federal interference.
Under House Bill 1113, election officials can begin mailing ballots 29 days before an election, and drop boxes must accept ballots for 22 days before Election Day, each an increase of seven days.
Also, this might be where they have allowed for some emergency decisions that would permit us to print our ballots.
And it establishes a committee that could be convened in such an emergency to help draft new rules “to ensure the proper administration of an election.”
That's a great option. I wasn't aware of that.
Fuck DeJoy with a rusty crowbar.
That’s a great option.
Just selectively quoting for the purposes of humor.
Absolutely this ! Do not trust the mail anymore.
I stopped trusting the mail for anything politicial ever since I participated in a postcard campaign for the 2024 election. I wrote a bunch of postcards to hundreds of people to remind them to vote, and I decided to write a few to my friends and family to verify that they were sent out. I stamped them, dropped them in the mailbox to be sent out on the day I was instructed to, and the 2024 election rolls around. I followed up with my friends and family to see if they got their postcards.
Not a single one received them.
Something undoubtedly fucky happened with the mail in 2024.
Part of the conservative plot is to erode trust in government anything. Then they can dismantle it and sell it off for parts to the private sector.
Education and the postal service are square in their targets and have been for decades. Same with things like Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid. Right now, they are stoking intergenerational conflict aimed at "boomers" with claims like they are "too entitled", there are "too many old people", and so on. Mark my words, that will be one of the drumbeats to take it away, put it into the stock market (or donnie's crypto schemes). And it's not like boomers will be the only ones affected, of course...
That's why I've been saying that 2020 is likely the last free election this country ever had. Tons of pedo-fuckery happened in 2024 they'd made it their absolute goal to make voting nothing more than a symbolic gesture.
It's in the fucking Constitution. There's no question here. Six Justices are traitors.
This will not be resolved by voting alone. (Edited for @Manjushri@piefed.social)
Voting has a much better chance of resolving this than not voting does. Voting is not perfect, but it's what we've got. Stop discouraging people from casting their vote.
Ideally, yes.
But the post service in the US is federalized under the USPS. And the USPS has been run by an orangeboi sycophant for about a decade at this point, who had made numerous changes to make mail ballots - both distribution and retrieval thereof - more strict and difficult, with the net effect of disenfranchising millions of voters.
Voter fraud is vanishingly rare.
Electoral fraud is a standard and commonly used strategy by the GOP in particular.
This is electoral fraud.
It'd be nice if we could use RICO laws to go after anyone in the USPS that is involved with doing this - the planning, the implementing, everything is swept up and given maximum penalty.
God I hope the timeline pans out that way :|
So that's the plan - when Democratic states don't comply to hand over their voter records, the postal service simply refuses to deliver their ballots from the Board of Elections. They can't vote if they never get the ballot in the first place.
And just like EVERYTHING else he ever does, it doesn't matter if it is blatantly illegal, against the constitution, violates everything, if we don't enforce it IMMEDIATELY then it is already too late and we are stuck with the consequences.
He shouldn't even BE president right now. He is illegal and illegitimate on account of commiting treason and insurrection. But no one enforced the law or constitution and so here we are.
And they are going to keep doing that until we say ENOUGH.
Now it's until he's in prison or dead.
Even if they do deliver them, I'm sure the verification process will be incredibly slow in blue states, so that the ballots will arrive after voting day.
This is the heart of the plan. Postal delays ensuring these votes won't be counted. Nothing "illegal" about "incompetence".
Meanwhile on Facebook posts about this, bots are pushing memes about how "The Democrats can't cheat this time."
I still have to laugh how conservative idiots believed and still believe that Big Tech is liberal and that the liberals in Big Tech actively worked to "cancel" them, shadowban, etc because they were conservatives...when were any of them ever cancelled for discussing smaller government or lower taxes?
No, if any of them had posts deleted or accounts given a time out, it was because they were doing something else like hate speech, etc...that for some weird reason, seems to be something conservatives require. Strange.
Anyway, for anyone to think that FB, Youtube, etc., are "liberal" means they are in complete delusion.
Under the timeline sketched out to meet the September 1 deadline, there would only be four days allotted for it to go through a stage in the development process in which potential users of the system can test it out.
I work on a live service video game, where we're constantly releasing updates and new content. But our release pipeline length means new code doesn't go live until it has been under test for at least a couple months. Because if someone finds a bug, there's turnaround time to get it fixed, submitted, built, and re-tested, looking for any potential new issues that were introduced with the fix. That's for a GAME. The idea that they might implement a verification system for MILLIONS of voters across MULTIPLE STATES and only have four days to test it before going live is horrifying.
Are ballots legally required to be handled by USPS? Is there any reason a state cannot contract out handling of ballots to UPS or FedEx?
If we look at the law, ballots don't qualify as anything other than 1st class mail, which the USPS has a legal monopoly on.
It's one of the handful of things that can actually get you in trouble with the postal marshals. They raided the credit reporting agencies at one point for sending credit reports via scheduled courier when they were neither time sensitive, heavy , expensive or short notice.
Well, ballots are clearly time sensitive. Reporting from 2020 claimed that UPS and FedEx can't legally postmark ballots: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fedex-ballot-vote-mail-facts-190031449.html
But can states just declare that unnecessary? I mean, a lot of states have ballot drop boxes, so it's not like USPS mail is the only alternative to in-person voting.
Must be Tuesday because that's another profound infringement of civil liberties.
If there are discrepancies like addresses? That means my mail in ballot is going to be flagged, because my house is in address limbo (used to be an apartment but not anymore, and USPS has rejected packages being sent to me because I did not put "Apt 1" at the end of my address).
This is just going to disenfranchise those living between addresses and people caught in red tape living in apartment houses.
Truly a shit show. I'm voting in person from now until question marks.
Truly a shit show.
As intended. This is not a well intended plan. The whole intention here is to disenfranchise voters because everyone knows, the move votes cast, the worse republicans do.
... judge last week froze the mandates that the states use the system if they want USPS to deliver their ballots, but said USPS could still offer the portal to states that voluntarily want to upload the mail voter information. The Justice Department is appealing that ruling.
... USPS leadership was dismissive of concerns, and, according to the report “insisted that it was easy to understand what was needed and also that there was no time to write down the requirements.”
... When election officials bring ballots to their USPS site for delivery, either the entire batch of ballot envelopes or a sampling will be physically scanned – depending on where the ballots are being dropped, according to the whistleblower. If just a single ballot envelope scan does not align with the information in the portal, USPS will refuse to deliver the entire batch of ballots while the discrepancy is being sorted out.
Neat. I wonder whether they will even tell anyone when their ballots are invalidated.
the courts should be looking at the legality of interfering with mail delivery. A federal offense. It should not require anything more to stop it. The post office is a long and hollowed tradition going back to the birth of the nation. I hate how often I look at our country and think this is nuts.
Hollowed is incorrect but aptly descriptive.
Register as a Republican, and they won't screw with you. Then vote Democrat, and completely screw up their plans.
The big benefit of mail in voting is that I don’t need to prepare in advance of going to the polls, or stand in a big line. I can sit down with my ballot at the kitchen table and read about issues or candidates as I fill it in. Once I’ve finished at my leisure, I take the ballot sealed in the return envelope and drop it off at a nearby polling place - most libraries are great for this and have drop boxes at the ready for a few weeks leading up to Election Day.
Even if I procrastinate to the last minute I can drop the sealed ballot at an in-person polling place on Election Day without waiting in the big line. Mail-in voting is still excellent even if you cut USPS out of the picture for the return portion. Maybe better to call it Mail-Out Voting and make that the standard.
Unless you’re out of state on deployment. Good luck getting Hegseth’s military to deliver any ballots.
That’s exactly the same for me. My ballot gets tracked from pick up to counting, and I can view my voting history online anytime.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.