9
submitted 1 day ago by Dave to c/politics

Labour has promised to ban big companies from charging excessive prices, if elected.

Leader Chris Hipkins said a handful of big businesses were guilty of price gouging - that is, charging more than necessary for essential items.

The full policy includes:

  • making it illegal for big companies with substantial market power to charge excessive prices for essential goods and services, or to pay unfairly low prices to suppliers
  • setting a legal test for price gouging: holding prices "well above what they would otherwise be in a competitive market, sustained over time"
  • requiring companies that gouge to pay penalties and hand back every dollar of excess profit
  • giving the Commerce Commission power to investigate price gouging and supporting consumer groups and suppliers to do the same.

Williams said similar rules were already in place in the United Kingdom, Europe, Canada, and Australia.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] BaconWrappedEnigma 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We used to have this as part of the Commerce Act: https://youtu.be/pONRoLttdaU?t=1635

EDIT: That entire episode is worth a listen if you have the time.

[-] Dave 4 points 1 day ago

To be honest I find it a bit crazy to think that we have a tribunal setting the prices of things right up to the early 90s. I find it really hard to see how something like that could come about today!

Cool video, a life long NZ economist who grew up in the wake of the Great Depression from a generation earlier. Thanks for linking, that was an interesting watch! We should really bring back state owned power and other essentials.

[-] Dave 8 points 1 day ago

My main question with this is if there is anything truly different from our current rules, and if those differences are clearly enough defined to actually be enforecable and make a difference.

[-] MadPsyentist 4 points 1 day ago

I think this policy of Labour's combined with the Greens policy of giving ComCom some teeth would be the best outcome of this whole cost of living debacle.

[-] Dave 2 points 1 day ago

At this point I'm just hoping someone invents a star trek style replicator to make money irrelevant.

[-] MadPsyentist 2 points 1 day ago

I for one welcome our new Latnim plated Ferengi overlords!

[-] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Politically setting prices never works as intended and always has highly problematic side effects. The real solution is to create conditions where no company can sustain a market dominating position. But this is a) hard and b) not easy to understand for voters. So "we'll make things cheap by law" is what it is.

[-] MadPsyentist 2 points 1 day ago

Its also hard for new zealand to have the market to sustain a competition in a bunch of markets. I like this policy because it is using government for what it is ment to do. Regulate.

Yes NZ is a small market. Yes your offshore money means you can be in a dominating position and quickly squash home growen competitors. No you cant be a dick about it, you can earn some of the monies, you dont need to have ALL of the monies.

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Politics

902 readers
30 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other LemmyNZ communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS