451
He thought she was really into leather jackets.
This is, 100%, without a doubt, just a way for him to avoid legal liability for doing things of his own free will. He wasn't complicit in smuggling! He was taken advantage of by that irresistible Chinese succubus! It's her fault!
Now, I don't really care. I think it's great that he's bypassing US sanctions. Altho I would prefer China have its own domestic chip manufacturing and not buy from companies like this, but until that is fully developed they need to get by somehow. But yeah this is the most obvious scapegoating I've ever seen.
In fact, I'd like NOBODY to buy from companies like this. NVIDIA should crash and fucking burn.
Yeah a real honey pot would have been steeling the next gen chip plans so the Chinese could move ahead and fab their own stuff.
Almost reads like standard Chinese business practice to me. Not to defend any of these grifters. Also , theres some dry humour in the article:
Notably, Jensen is currently married to his wife of 41 years
“currently”, haha
I really enjoy some dry journalistic homicide.
Two billion dollars worth of sales doesn't seem like the kind of thing any single person could be "fooled" into signing off on.
that's like 6 gpu's tho
If she had scalped them she could have made $4 billion easy.
The fool, she only got tree fitty
Jensen Huang isn't that big, but a job's a job.
Oh yes, he was “fooled.” What a buffoon! Ha ha ha ha! She gottem!
Waste of a honeypot. I reckon he would sell his grandmother for cash... don't believe for a moment that he and nvidia are not finding ways to sell past/through/around restrictions anyway
"The girl I'm seeing is asking me to break the law, doing exactly what would bring me more money, and being stupid and naive I fell for it!"
Yeah, right.
Yeah, it might be like an unspoken plausible deniability contingency.
If they get caught he couldn’t have known! It was HER!!!!
It's always the ones you most expect.
OMG, that's got to be dozens of 64GB sticks!
Altman is furious.
Ah yes, because NVIDIA's Huang famously never closed his eyes to smuggling without a blowjob. He also never lobbied US gov't to let him sell chips to China.
What's this bullshit trying to accomplish, launder Jensen's image as a US patriot or something? Or is this insurance against being dragged in court by the democrats for “睜一隻眼閉一隻眼“ (“Open One Eye, Close One Eye”)?
One more reason to replace all CEOs with AI
Except they sent an 8 instead of a 6.
It might just be his animal magnetism. Maybe he seduced the chinese spy.
I wonder if he wrote his apology letter or if he has Ai do it for him.
Another pathetic loser, sociopathic manipulative piece of shit. Should be bullied to suicide. Fuck the lot of them.
Was her opening line "I love leather... jackets"?
She probably sent him this awesome music video!
Shallow Gravy - Jacket (OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMtqy9_NbYg
US intelligence believes Stupid Jacket had romantic relationship with Chinese spy in honeypot operation — spy suspect linked to company accused of smuggling $2 billion in AI chips
industrial espionage of course.
OK, we're finished using you now! Bye!
How does she look?
Well, he is a billionaire, so I’d guess 12
Asking the real questions here
IMO, this is probably a lie manufactured by the Trump Regime. Trump just wants to steal Jensen's fortune, and to punish a "china man" for daring to do well in life.
Indict that bitch!
The value of the chips is probably less important than the possession of them that allows them to reverse engineer them, if they haven't already.
If they wanted to reverse engineer, they would've just bought some hardware in the USA- or any other country -and brought it to china but whatever
they can easily get a few dozen chips to reverse engineer, why shouldn't billionaires be able to give egirls a billion in hardware anyway
If they were going to reverse engineer then, couldn’t they just buy some consumer hardware in the USA and bring it back?
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
451 points (99.6% liked)
World News
59069 readers
1751 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS