565
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 121 points 21 hours ago

That is not late. Oaks are slow growing trees, a timeline of 200 years is expected for them.

[-] SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk 49 points 19 hours ago

Think about how long it took to grow when carving wood. Then you fuck it up and ruin it. A tree older than the oldest relative you can remember died for this and you ruined it.

At some point I do want to buy some proper wood rather than using broken fence panels, but then it costs money.

[-] Ariselas@piefed.ca 15 points 12 hours ago

Wait till you spend a hundred bucks on a small piece of rosewood to build a guitar bridge and cock it up.

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

This seems oddly specific. Someone you know?

[-] Ariselas@piefed.ca 6 points 9 hours ago

or so I'm told ...

[-] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago

This is why I only use fast-growing, purpose-harvested pine.

This, and the "costs money" part. You either have an entire lumber mill in your garage, or you buy the expensive, pre-milled stuff. There's no way wood furniture is cheap. It's like if they can't sell us the finished furniture, they're going to get their profit from the materials to build it.

Fuck Capitalism, and the billionaires who leech from us.

[-] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Technically you can mill and shape lumber by hand with handsaws and like a jack plane. It does take awhile, though

[-] SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk 2 points 15 hours ago

Given I want to make small things I have wondered about using firewood. Probably a lot of work to saw it down though and often has cracks from drying quickly.

There are some fallen trees in the park. Could I just take them?

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

There are some fallen trees in the park. Could I just take them?

That's highly variable depending on country and local law. Usually no that wouldn't be legal.

In places like National parks or conservation areas I'd encourage you to leave them alone. A dead tree is part of the natural cycle.

A city park where they will mulch it up tomorrow definitely ecologically fine to take. Check local legality

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 7 hours ago

You also need to let the wood cure.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 18 hours ago

i think this is also why conifers are so popular for timber these days, grows much faster. AFAIK something like pine takes maybe 40 years until it can be harvested.

[-] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Check out “daisugi,” a Japanese pollarding technique that produces usable timber even faster (basically having one rootstock grow multiple main trunks). IIRC in the 1700’s they were harvesting pine every 25 years

However, it ain’t no replacement for oak. Does smell a lot better, though

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 28 points 16 hours ago

40 year mature conifers also have completely different properties and is subpar for the things oak is great for. A conifer won't work as a mast for example. Fast grown confiers will rot like crazy.

They work well enough for situations where they are protected from the elements, which is why they are used in construction. But an old house made from slow growth, espicially a lot of hardwoods, won't instantly rot when water gets in.

[-] horsesaysweird@feddit.org 6 points 12 hours ago

A conifer won't work as a mast for example.

Acorn to Arabella made their mast from spruce: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGac8Xa-i8A (skip to 1:53)

I don't really know what I'm talking about, but I think an oak mast is more likely to break in a storm because it's stiffer.

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I should have said for warships to be extra clear as if you make something small enough even balsa wood works. Also, oak holds up better in a wet and salty environment.

They used oak because it was proven to work across centuries. They took down sails during storms to avoid damage to the mast, which would happen no matter what wood is used.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 7 hours ago

Douglas fir are historically popular for masts as well because they grow so straight and tall.

[-] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Spruce is a great material for masts because it’s light and strong. Fir might be appropriate, too. Avoid pine, it’s knotty and rots faster.

[-] JamieDub86@piefed.social 19 points 19 hours ago

It's late if you want to build a warship out of them. Environmentally though, it's fantastic.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

"I know not which weapons will be used to fight WWIII, but it'll be sticks and stones in WWIV" to misquote whoever that was. Maybe it's still a little early. heh

[-] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

The original quote was Einstein, btw

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

"The original quote was Einstein, btw"

— Abraham Lincoln, probably

And thank you. I'd forgotten the source, only remembered it through Cards Against Humanity. hehe

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2026
565 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

3099 readers
683 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

  6. Avoid posting AI-generated content whenever possible.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS