this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
21 points (88.9% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1683 readers
79 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The overall score was determined by factors including minimum wage, sick leave, maternity leave, healthcare availability, public happiness, average working hours, and LGBTQ+ inclusivity.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rangelus 6 points 2 years ago

I honestly find that hard to believe, given Germany for example has over a year of paid maternity leave, same free healthcare, better public transport etc etc.

[–] Dave 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

a high rate of sick pay (80 percent)

What does that mean? Is this referring to ACC paying 80% of salary?

The Australia one says:

sickness leave is paid at 100 percent of your salary.

Are these talking about the same thing? I would think normal sick leave is paid at 100% of your salary so I'm curious where the 80% figure comes from.

[–] luthis 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sick leave yes, but not ACC ie long term sickness leave.

[–] Dave 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah but ACC isn't even long term sickness leave. That would be a WINZ benefit e.g. Supported Living Payment.

ACC is specifically only for accidents. I can find an Australian equivalent to the WINZ support which works pretty much the same, but I can't find any info about salary replacement for what I think is the ACC equivalent, National Disability Insurance Scheme.

Anyway, I think we've decided there's no real study behind this "article", it's just a company trying to be talked about. There doesn't actually seem to be a study that we can read, and based on some of the other articles on their site (e.g. this similar one on work-life balance by US state) it's not very scientific. There's no source for the data they've used, and their choices of what criteria to use are pretty arbitrary.

[–] z2k_ 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I can’t figure it out either. I wonder if they got an intern to do a quick google on each country.

[–] gibberish_driftwood 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Has anyone come across the study? I can't find any references anywhere except for articles on Newshub and Stuff. I can't even narrow down which employment company it might be that ran the study, but if it's this one then it doesn't seem to be making a big deal of any of this on its press coverage page.

[–] Dave 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think that's the right Remote. Searching for the name of the Remote CRO leads to a LinkedIn page that lists him as working for this Remote: https://remote.com

But this is smelling more like an ad for the company...

[–] gibberish_driftwood 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks. That looks like the right company but it's still really hard to navigate their website and I can't find any trace of info about this report.

I wonder if there's a list of countries out there which ranks by media-most-susceptible-to-republishing-press-releases-which-place-their-country-at-favourable-position-in-rankings.

Probably not because we'd have seen it on Newshub by now.

[–] Dave 4 points 2 years ago

Haha yeah this was pretty much my conclusion too.

[–] CosmicApe@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I heard this on the radio while driving home after working 0500-1930. What a load of shit

[–] absGeekNZ 2 points 2 years ago

Whilst your particular experience may not be what the study found, it does not in fact invalidate the study.

[–] Fizz 1 points 2 years ago

We do have a good work life balance here but there's no way it's the best in the world.

load more comments
view more: next ›