233
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] frog@feddit.uk 23 points 1 month ago

I have not seen the live action version. Was it good? Was it necessary?

[-] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago
[-] frog@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago

I appreciate you saving me from watching this. Lol

[-] randombullet@programming.dev 23 points 1 month ago

It also missed a few vital scenes. They cut down the movie to fit within an arbitrary time limit.

[-] HowdyLemmy@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago

I'm flabbergasted that they found a way to do a shot-for-shot remake wrong.

[-] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

They intentionally wanted to make the shot-for-shot remake fail so they can point at it "still failing" and continue to ruin more remakes.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

What? That makes no sense.

[-] degen@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Did they know the original is shorter?

[-] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago

It just struck me that the 'live action' version of most movies are still like 90% CGI... Really the only thing not computer generated are the actors and even then, only mostly. What's even the difference at that point?

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

An attempt to apeal to the "cartoons are for babies" crowd?

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago
[-] Unboxious@ani.social 3 points 1 month ago

I mean, there's a >0 number of good live-action adaptations of animated shows. I've heard mainly good things about the Netflix One Piece show.

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

If it's so good, then why is there only One Piece of it? Why not a Second or Third Piece?

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's apparently an adaptation, not a shot for shot transcription.

[-] Unboxious@ani.social 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah but that's not necessarily a bad thing. You probably wouldn't want a shot-for-shot transcription going from manga to live-action.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It was good. It was almost a beat for beat, scene for scene remake. The only scene I specifically noticed being omitted was the one on the beach with the small dragons.

It was almost like DreamWorks was telling Disney, "Hey, this is how you do it. Keep the story the same, and it works, dumb mouse."

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's a live action version? I just assumed the middle screenshot was DLSS 5.

[-] Davel23@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago

Could make a "DLSS 5 on/off" meme with the top two pictures.

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Because I'm too ADHD to read post titles, I literally thought that's what this was at first.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

In the original toothless is a common green dragon with one tooth. Bro’s a sassy bastard and the whole point is that Hiccup has to be the hero with a severely lacking toolset.

[-] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Well technically not quite but that's Spoilers

[-] TerraRoot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

There is a book?! Nice, imma go find it

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[-] Master167@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

And here I was looking for the source in the comments.

[-] Shipgirlboy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

First two are "How to train your Dragon", the third is "Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid"

[-] AyuTsukasa@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Top: How to Train Your Dragon

Bottom: Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid

[-] thenoirwolfess@fedinsfw.app 8 points 1 month ago

Is the Animé a flavour of "thicc girl encourages perversions of socially awkward horny boy"? Because that's so blasé; it's overused.

[-] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Surprisingly no. Those 2 depicted are just side characters and actually have a somewhat healthy relationship. And the main cast is generally not that sexualized.

To be clear, the issue you point out does exist, just not with these 2 specific characters.

[-] thenoirwolfess@fedinsfw.app 1 points 1 month ago

Going on my watchlist :3 ty!

[-] SterileSullage@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Not really. Guy in the bottom picture is a minor character. The show largely centers around a dragon girl (not the one pictured) who arrives at the human world injured, gets saved by another girl who works as a programmer, and then moves in as her maid out of gratitude. Dragon girl falls in love with programmer girl due to the kindness she shows her.

[-] thenoirwolfess@fedinsfw.app 1 points 1 month ago

Ty, that sounds super cool!

[-] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Not entirely, that artist is also a confirmed pedo

[-] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Sources? Have googled a bit and couldn't find anything that paints the artist as a pedo.

I mean apart from the depiction of the characters, which is really weak as a confirmation of anything, seeing as a lot of Japanse works have the same questionable aesthetics.

[-] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

I'm not going to search too deep for the sake of my own eyes, but had seen reference to their other works in a post on reddit that go beyond "questionable aesthetics" and into straight up 'that is a child'

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

That's half the male population of Japan

[-] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Thats a fuckin wild generalisation to make about an entire country's population

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago

If they had an actual cultural problem with it pedo merchandise wouldn't be advertised in store windows.

[-] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago

Im assuming by that you mean 'if the people took issue with it', not 'if there was a cultural problem of pedo shit' (not trying to argue semantics, I do agree that there is 100% a cultural problem with normalising that kind of thing)

I'm only taking issue with you generalising a >120 MILLION population and labelling them as pedos

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bro, it's Japan. If they (meaning rich Japanese men) don't like it, it's illegal to do. And they don't like a lot of things.

And I didn't generalize 120 million people.

I specifically made a claim about 30 million of them, the pedo ones.

One of the things about Japan is that they tend to take community complaints relatively seriously. That's admirable in certain ways, but what it also means is that you get anything illegalized if you're enough of a Karen about it, from pedo merchandise to brown people existing.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
233 points (97.2% liked)

Animemes

4296 readers
74 users here now

Memes related to anime. Animemes.


Rules

  1. Be respectful.

  2. Memes must be anime or is sufficiently related to anime culture. Anime-adjacent content are also permitted (e.g. manga/manhwa/manhua, light and visual novels, VTubers, and media with anime aesthetics).

  3. Use the NSFW tag for lewd content. No genitalia, scat, extreme gore, snuff, or bestiality, per ani.social's ToS.

  4. Reposts only if the most recent same-content post is over 3 months old.

  5. No AI-generated content.


Related Communities

General
Game/VTuber

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS