Imagine paying to sit and listen to a 90 minute team meeting that could have been an email.
If you're paying to work a job, it's a scam, they are never going to pay you
I wouldn't be surprised if that effectively happens in some industries, specifically in the arts or sports where there are tons of applicants chasing a dream. There is a reason why people know of the casting couch.
That said, I really don't see that happening in any IT, science, medical, or engineering field anytime soon. Unlike in the arts, I don't see how an industry which needs a certain level of technical competence will find it so widely available that people would pay them for experience.
HOTL - Humans in the Loop... nice acronym 🤦
The system must be abolished.
Controversial take: it's called fuck off, her specifically in this case. And anyone else spouting this bullshit in the future. They will not build a good future for anyone but themselves. Sociopaths.
Nationalize all AI projects immediately
It’s literally her job to sell her “AI” but she makes it sound like the worst idea.
there are already a thing called 'paid internship' where you pay and work for them. fuck this shit
WAIT WHAT THE FUCK ITS NOT YOU BEING PAID IN ONE OF THOSE???
So you can never leave the job because your "education" is worthless anywhere else. You'll have to pay another employer for their training on the same subjects instead.
Hot take, everything she said is extremely out of touch with reality.
They could even lend you the money you need to pay for that training, how nice of them! Then, when you do start getting paid, they can take repayment (with interest) directly from your paycheck. How convenient!
They could also pay people in a form of crypto that's only accepted at the store in town that happens to be owned by the same people as your employer. Try trading that crypto for real cash, and you're fired.
They could even provide a place for your family to live, how nice! It's too bad if you found a cheap place to live elsewhere, it's in your contract now: gotta live in company housing if you want to work for the company. They'll take the rent right out of your paycheck too. How convenient.
Now if you even mention the word "union," in one fell swoop, they can't take your job, your home and your ability to buy food for yourself and your family.
None of this is new. People in West Virginia (and elsewhere, of course) gave their lives so that we could move on from this shit as a society.
Those people would be sickened by what their chickenshit state has become, but that's besides the point...
Most people don't know any history of labor. I barely know anything and I'm interested in the topic. It's frustrating. I mean, I can accept the ingnorance. That's natural. But the lack of curiosity is upsetting.
You're focusing on the wrong thing - lack of curiosity isn't a problem. In fact, humans are naturally curious, what you see here is something strategically impeding that curiosity. Indoctrination is a major thing, but there is also active suppression if a given individual is too "radical" to be indoctrinated.
Sure, but there has to be some agency on the part of people. Like, yes they're victims of propaganda and such, but I don't want a model where everyone is acted upon and never acts. My wealthy coworkers who just don't read books are who I'm thinking of. They have ample time and resources to learn more, but it's easier to just watch anime and play dota.
If you don't expect them to ever act, then nothing will change and we'll just be crushed by capitalism and friends forever.
And by act I don't even mean like go start a revolution, or a mutual aid group, or do anything dramatic. Just spend 20 minutes reading about history. Be curious. Overcome the quagmire of propaganda we're immersed in. Just for a little bit.
Kids did not "learn how to use the internet" they learned how to use Google products, Apple products, and Meta products. These things are intentionally designed to PREVENT the user from learning any generalizable knowledge or transferrable skills.
Go ask the next kid you see what a file is, and despair.
Who wants to bet she had a trust fund?
I read it as her being very critical of this development (read in particular: “we will take the easy immediate wins”)
I sincerely doubt it. She's the Co-Founder and CEO of an AI company that has absolutely no financial incentive to be critical of this development, and if anything all the incentive to encourage it.
If anything it seems more like she's had a revelation as tell the suckers how they can have their cake (the easy win) and eat it too. Kick all the mid-level managers out, replace them with AI, then make the trainees pay to work for you because they have no other choice.
I would love to see an update on this totally sane person in a few years.
Hate subs, devoted to hating something, usually do not appreciate being told not to hate something.
Controversial take: anyone who pushes for this needs to be lined up against a wall and shot
How is that controversial?
The 1% wouldn't agree
Now, now. The people who would suffer from that kind of violence will be quick to tell you violence is never the answer. You have to move through the systems they built.
Sorry sir, I'll try to be better, sir
That's the correct response, not a controversial one.
What you said is much less controversial than what she said
The whole kids will learn ai like they learn the Internet is a terrible take, on top of all the other terrible takes. The youngest of us right now often have devices that 'just work' and they fall flat if the device doesn't work.
This is why my kid gets hand me downs barely running an os. If they can't fix it, it's still mine.
(Realistically, the pc they use is a 10 year old Windows machine, and the good pc is running Bazzite, so once they yearn for fps, they need to learn how to use it)
I read it even worse than just the didactic aspects. She doesn't think we ever needed to teach children how to be safe and protect themselves online (or now with ai). They just naturally know how not to get mauled by creeps.
I'm having trouble believing she's a living woman. I understood the weight of it all, as a child, 20 years ago. She's braindead.
I can see a version of this where the government subsidizes the costs of recruiting entry-level
What a fucking moron.
They really don't realize how much admiring AI is revealing their own general professional uselessness.
Edit: People who don't regret the things AI lacks - are signaling that they don't have it, and don't have access to it in their professional networks. To begin with, that's sad. But when they post publicly about it, they're revealing that they aren't even aware of what they're not bringing to their teams.
AI grifter shills their grift, more news at 5
Sees bat-shit insane take on AI in the future, looks underneath:
Cooper AI Co. Founder
Right, so she's another grifter riding the bubble, looking for AI deranged ~~executives~~ suckers to burn their money on her company's tokens.
I would love to watch the companies that do this collapse from being entirely top heavy when their AIs bleed them dry with tokens and there's no humans left to carry them.
So if I were walking down the street and saw this person slip off the curb in front of an oncoming bus, I would think very carefully about whether or not saving their life would be a good thing for the humane race in the long term.
On the other hand, this post is seems disturbingly prescient. I will not be surprised if I see such educational opportunities being offered in the near future. In fact, I expect to see more posts like this as a way to test the waters or maybe desensitize people to the idea.
What a looney tunes.
Used to be you bought positions, like I'm the army, for the amount of money you could buy a house for.
Jenny K needs to speak to St. Luigi
Where the fuck is Luigi.
LinkedinLunatics
A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com
(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)