1
56
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Today is Tuesday, 10/20 and the general US Elections are in TWO WEEKS.

As it stands right now, the current Senate composition is:
47 - Democrats
51 - Republicans
2 - Independents

Looking at the numbers, we COULD see a huge shift in the Senate this year, best case scenario would be:

52 - Democrats
45 - Republicans
3 - Independents

Chart Follows:

State Current Occupant Status D Cand R Cand Polling 10/18 Outcome Polling Direction
Colorado Democratic Hickenlooper Safe D John Hickelooper Mark Baisley D+6
Delaware Democratic Coons Safe D Chris Coons Michael Katz D+29.7
Georgia Democratic Ossoff Safe D Jon Ossoff Mike Collins D+8
Illnois Democratic Durbin Safe D Juliana Stratton Don Tracy D+20
Massachusetts Democratic Markey Safe D Ed Markey John Deaton D+24
New Hampshire Democratic Shaheen Safe D Chris Pappas John E. Sununu D+7
New Jersey Democratic Booker Safe D Cory Booker Justin Murphy D+22
New Mexico Democratic Luja Safe D Ben Ray Luján Larry Marker D+18
Oregon Democratic Merkley Safe D Jeff Merkley David Brock Smith D+25
Rhode Island Democratic Reed Safe D Jack Reed Raymond McKay D+20
Virginia Democratic Warner Safe D Mark Warner Bert Mizusawa D+20
Minnesota Democratic Smith D Peggy Flanagan Michele Tafoya D+4
North Carolina Republican Tillis D Roy Cooper Michael Whatley D+10 Possible D Flip D Momentum since 6/1
Alabama Republican Tuberville Safe R Everett Wess Barry Moore R+21
Arkansas Republican Cotton Safe R Hallie Shoffner Tom Cotton R+9
Florida Republican Moody Safe R Angie Nixon Ashley Moody R+5.2
Idaho Republican Risch Safe R Withdrawn Jim Risch R+12.1
Kentucky Republican McConnell Safe R Charles Booker Andy Barr R+9
Louisiana Republican Cassidy Safe R Jamie Davis Julia Letlow R+4
Mississippi Republican Hyde-Smith Safe R Cindy Hyde-Smith Scott Colom R+9
Montana Republican Daines Safe R Alani Bankhead Kurt Alme R+16
Nebraska Republican Ricketts Safe R Dan Osborn (I) Pete Ricketts R+1 R Momentum since 10/1
Oklahoma Republican Armstrong Safe R N'Kiyla Thomas Kevin Hern R+28
South Dakota Republican Rounds Safe R Brian Bengs Mike Rounds R+6
Tennessee Republican Hagerty Safe R Marquita Bradshaw Bill Hagerty R+25
West Virgiia Republican Capito Safe R Rachel Fetty Anderson Shelley Moore Capito R+21
Wyoming Republican Lummis Safe R James Byrd Harriet Hageman R+23
South Carolina Republican Graham R Annie Andrews Darline Graham R+1 R Momentum since 8/29
Alaska Republican Sullivan Tossup Mary Peltola Dan Sullivan D+3 Possible D Flip D Momentum since 8/4
Iowa Republican Ernst Tossup Josh Turek Ashley Hinson D+1 Possible D Flip D Momentum since 9/10
Kansas Republican Marshall Tossup Adam Hamilton Roger Marshall D+1 Possible D Flip D Momentum since 10/1
Maine Republican Collins Tossup Troy Jackson Susan Collins D+2 Possible D Flip D Momentum since 7/6
Michigan Democratic Peters Tossup Abdul El-Sayed Mike Rogers D+3 Possible R Flip D Momentum since 8/17
Ohio Republican Husted Tossup Sherrod Brown Jon Husted D+4 Possible D Flip D Momentum since 6/2
Texas Republican Cornyn Tossup James Talarico Ken Paxton D+4 Possible D Flip D Momentum since 6/1
2
6
submitted 2 hours ago by Quilotoa@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
3
30

Jeffrey Toobin shredded the DOJ's latest criminal charges against James Comey as a “fiasco” and a “disgrace,” accusing Trump of waging an “insane vendetta."

The post Jeffrey Toobin Shreds New Comey Charges as a ‘Fiasco’ Fueled by Trump’s ‘Insane Vendetta’ first appeared on Mediaite.

4
8
submitted 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by yonderbarn@lazysoci.al to c/politics@lemmy.world
5
51
6
44

Remember, it's your duty to vote for someone who wants you dead, because the other guy wants you even more dead!

7
220
submitted 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Daughter of ex-FBI director James Comey, a Trump foe, was dismissed in 2025 despite her work being widely praised

Maurene Comey, the daughter of the former FBI director James Comey, was unlawfully fired from her job as a federal prosecutor in New York last year, a federal judge ruled on Monday.

Judge Jesse Furman said that Comey, who was an assistant US attorney for a decade, was illegally fired in July 2025 despite her work on some of the nation’s highest-profile cases and consistently receiving “the highest accolades from supervisors and peers alike”.

After her firing, Comey sued the justice department and others, saying her termination violated the constitutional separation of powers, the first amendment and the due process clause of the fifth amendment.

8
43
submitted 7 hours ago by slothrop@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
9
45
submitted 7 hours ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world
10
35
11
35
12
261

Democrats just dropped a heavy hammer on the president, eight days out from Election Day. House Judiciary Committee Democrats released a 50-page report Monday morning accusing Donald Trump of participating in Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal sex schemes. The caucus also accused the Trump administration of a broad cover-up, designed to shield the president from blowback as they tried to roll out the release of the Epstein files to the general public. The report cites the experiences of 11 women, FBI records, and d...

13
142
submitted 11 hours ago by silence7@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

People Over Party raised $7.7 million in 2024, all of it from the nonprofit behind the Fair Election Fund, which in turn got every dollar from a Musk-funded dark money group.

14
107

Trump told Bill Maher not to call him again after the comedian defended their White House dinners while continuing to criticize the president.

15
164
16
152
17
148
submitted 13 hours ago by grue@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/88710

Progressive Leader Defeats Flavio Bolsonaro in Runoff, Blunting Washington’s Push for Regional Allies.

On Sunday, the unexpected reelection of Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva represents a setback for U.S. President Donald Trump’s plans to consolidate his influence in Latin America, at a time when the rightward shift of several countries seemed to be clearing his path.

RELATED:

Trump’s Grip on Senate at Stake in 10 Key Midterm Races

The Workers’ Party leader prevailed with nearly 52% of the vote over far-right Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, son of former President Jair Bolsonaro (2019-2022), and became the first candidate to win a runoff after finishing second in the first round.

As Trump has yet to comment on the results, which Flavio has refused to recognize, Lula’s victory frustrates the possibility that Washington could add Latin America’s largest economy to its bloc of regional allies.

The setback for the MAGA leader comes just days before midterm elections in which polls indicate Democrats could wrest control of Congress from him.

A Limit on Regional Momentum

In his second term, Trump announced he would revive the Monroe Doctrine, a 19th-century policy he invokes to assert U.S. primacy in Latin America.

When he returned to the White House, his regional allies were few, among them Javier Milei in Argentina, Nayib Bukele in El Salvador, and Daniel Noboa in Ecuador.

Rightward shifts in Honduras (Nasry Asfura), Bolivia (Rodrigo Paz), Chile (Jose Antonio Kast), Peru (Keiko Fujimori), and Colombia (Abelardo de la Espriella) broadened that bloc. On repeated occasions, Trump boasted of having contributed to those victories.

The axis of Trump’s foreign policy toward Latin America is the “Shield of the Americas,” an alliance supposedly aimed at fighting drug trafficking but which in reality seeks to consolidate U.S. hegemony. Flavio Bolsonaro had promised to join that new U.S. geopolitical instrument.

Washington also seeks to counter China’s growing influence in Latin America, although a Flavio victory would hardly have altered Brazil’s economic ties with the Asian giant, given the weight of the agro-industrial sector in the Bolsonarist coalition and its dependence on the Chinese market.

Currently, Lula’s presidency in Brazil and Claudia Sheinbaum’s presidency in Mexico emerge as the main counterweights to Trump’s domination project.

This story is extremely important:

A whistleblower revealed that Brazil's far-right Bolsonaro family dynasty met with Meta to discuss US plans to interfere in Brazil's election, to prevent Lula from winning.

Lula's Facebook and Instagram accounts were censored a few days before… pic.twitter.com/lB8pkvssqY

— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) October 15, 2026

A Calculated Caution

Despite what was at stake in Brazil, Trump avoided expressly supporting Flavio Bolsonaro, unlike what happened in Colombia, where he openly backed De la Espriella. His presence, however, was felt, and Lula’s campaign denounced interference from Washington.

Lula himself declared in his victory speech that the result demonstrates that in Brazil “we do not accept being anyone’s backyard.”

A Flavio victory would have meant “100 percent alignment with Trump in his culture war and security policy,” explained Benjamin Gedan, director of the Latin America Program at the Stimson Center think tank.

The Republican was “clearly excited about this possibility,” but an explicit endorsement could have “hurt” the candidate, he added.

Trump, however, had already taken a stand through his actions. In 2025, his administration imposed high tariffs on Brazil in response to the trial against Jair Bolsonaro, who was sentenced to prison for attempting a coup d’etat against Lula in 2023.

In May, Trump received presidential candidate Flavio Bolsonaro in the Oval Office, an unusual gesture since he was not a head of state. Flavio asked him to designate the First Capital Command (PCC) and the Red Command as terrorist organizations.

The White House agreed to that request four days later, a decision Lula opposed out of fear that the measure would open the door to U.S. interventionism.

Washington also opened a trade investigation against Brazil over alleged unfair practices, revoked the visa of the Brazilian ambassador and suspended its consular services two days before the first round — in which Bolsonaro defeated Lula — citing security reasons.

That involvement also exposes Washington to the region’s political changes. For Oliver Stuenkel, a researcher at the Carnegie center, ideological alliances are a fragile bet in a scenario marked by frequent alternations in power.

“The kind of ideological interventionism that the Trump administration is carrying out in the region is counterproductive. In the medium and long term, it will strengthen anti-American forces,” he said.

Lula’s reelection thus forces Washington to deal with a Brazil that does not share its agenda and highlights the limits of its strategy for Latin America.

teleSUR/ JF

Source: EFE


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

18
105
submitted 13 hours ago by beep@piefed.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
19
113
submitted 14 hours ago by VioletTea@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
20
174
submitted 15 hours ago by slothrop@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
21
51

American forces in the Middle East are prepared to launch a major new military offensive against Iran within 96 hours of receiving an order from President Donald Trump, two U.S. officials told CNN in a report published Monday. The necessary forces are already deployed in the region, but Trump has not made a final decision on whether to authorize the operation.

The potential campaign would be considerably broader than the limited strikes carried out against Iranian military assets in recent months. U.S. Central Command and the Pentagon have developed an extensive list of possible targets, including nuclear facilities, military installations and energy infrastructure.

22
71
submitted 15 hours ago by slothrop@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
23
96
submitted 15 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

In a rare Sunday hearing, a federal appeals court judge appointed by Trump questioned how the Trump administration’s request to intervene in California’s ongoing midterm election in order to force state officials to set aside 20,000 ballots from voters whose citizenship it questions squares with the U.S. Constitution.

Judge Mark J. Bennett said that while the executive branch is “unhappy” with what California law requires for ensuring voters are citizens, the state has the right to determine the manner of its elections under the Elections Clause of the Constitution and Congress has not challenged that process, despite having the ability to do so.

“It seems to me that you want us to issue an injunction that is entirely inconsistent with the law the California Legislature has adopted pursuant to the Elections Clause,” Bennett said. “How can we do that?”

24
602
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by Sunflier@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

House Judiciary Committee Democrats on Monday released an unsigned staff report laying out what they call “the case against Donald Trump emerging in the Epstein Files and DOJ’s desperate efforts to cover it up,” with those Democrats now calling for an independent special counsel to investigate the president as well as what they describe as Attorney General Todd Blanche’s conflicts of interest and the Justice Department’s reluctance to share relevant evidence with state and foreign law enforcement.

“The women who survived Epstein deserve to be heard,” the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said in a statement. “Congress must have the complete files required by law, and an independent special counsel must investigate Epstein’s co-conspirators and DOJ’s cover-up and ensure that state and foreign prosecutors have the evidence they need to pursue justice.”

The more than 50-page report alleges that Trump was “an active participant in Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of young women in the mid-to-late 1990s.” Although it also contains at least one entirely new allegation against the president, it provides no direct evidence other than the woman’s own conversations with Judiciary Committee staff.

He raped children, but the cult doesn't care. They like rapding children as evidenced by how many Republicans and church people keep getting caught raping children.

*Edit: fixed a typo.

25
231
view more: next ›

politics

31535 readers
2281 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS