451
I think I can explain. In Buddhism, you have to understand if he didn’t the last into the pizza, but from where I stand it simply is. I hope that helps.
If you have to ask... then you don't know
I was reading some Proverbs (Bible 1) in a simplified translation and every second verse is a straight tautology. Better translations use phrasing and rhyme to hide it, but people love platitudes and will meme them into a global religion.
It is what it is!
You (self) will never achieve nirvana (enlightenment) unless your Buddhist (eastern religion) stories have a bunch of untranslated Sanskrit (language) words in them that the translator (language expert) was too lazy (high on their own farts) to translate (explain). So every Buddhist buddhavacana (text) reads like this
I just have 2 verses in my personal book of Philosophy and Words to Live By.
Verse 1: If you think you understand what's going on, you haven't been paying attention.
Verse 2: There is no situation that is so bad that it can't get worse. And it's about to get worse.
My preferred version of verse two is: There isn't anything you can't blow up twice.
My verse 2 stems from when I was a medic back in the day, and we got paged for a "don't feel so good" call. We got there and the patient was visually not in the best shape. I decided we were upgrading the call to a "swoop and scoop" to hit the road to the hospital with little delay.
We were lifting that patient out of her recliner and turning her enough to sit her down on the cot when she literally died right then and there. Which of course got the patient another upgrade from the "swoop and scoop" to "Oh shit! Oh shit! We gotta go! We gotta go now!" which also adds the "Inject ALL the diesel!" upgrade for the driver.
A quick check found no pulse or respirations. So I started CPR and my partner grabbed the 12 lead to get the big pads if we needed to shock and placed the pads. I did 2 rounds of CPR and we hit the analyze button. Which said no shock. And a quick check of the patient's vitals showed everything was working again. If in a bit of a sketchy fashion.
We got loaded and roared off in a cloud of diesel smoke and made the 20 mile trip to the hospital with little delay and no worsening of the patient's condition. After radioing in to the hospital with a patient report, the patient was met with all hands on deck at the door when we arrived.
I heard the patient died about 2 months later in a nursing home. One of the perks of working rural EMS where you work on family and friends.
And thus, rule #2 was born.
Reminds me of the kind of thing you'd read in a Douglas Adams book.
Scientist theorize that if we knew why the ~~bowl of petunias~~piles of shit thought this, we'd have a better understanding of the universe.
Koans are designed to be given by a teacher to a student when the teacher personally assesses that the student could benefit from considering it. They're also designed to not be comprehensible rationally or immediately, but rather to prompt introspection and to get someone to reflect on their own thought patterns. You can't just rip them out of that context while not understanding the belief system and treat them like a riddle from Reader's Digest and expect to get anything out of them.
...and the Lemming was enlightened
I admire your knowledge of Buddhist theory.
But this is a shit post community so it's as unserious as the most zen person in the world.
In the Second Scroll of Wen the Eternally Surprised, a story is written concerning one day when the apprentice Clodpool, in a rebellious mood, approached Wen and spake thusly:
“Master, what is the difference between a humanistic, monastic system of belief in which wisdom in sought by means of an apparently nonsensical system of questions and answers, and a lot of mystic gibberish made up on the spur of the moment?”
Wen considered this for some time, and at last said: “A fish!”
And Clodpool went away, satisfied.
I love how, even never having read this before, I know it's Terry Pratchett
Here's a legit Zen koan that fits the bill:
Mumonkan number 14: Nansen kills the cat
Once the monks of the Western and Eastern Halls were arguing about a cat. Nansen, holding up the cat, said, “You monks! If you can say a word of Zen, I will spare the cat. Otherwise I will kill it.” No one could answer, so Nansen cut the cat in two. That evening, when Joshu returned, Nansen told him of the incident. Joshu thereupon took off his sandal, put it on his head, and walked off. Nansen said, “If you had been there, the cat would have been saved!”
:::spoiler an interpretation
It might make more sense if you replace Joshu's actions with "doing a jerk-off motion." He's treating the discussion as unserious, as well as treating himself as unserious.
Nansen shows up looking to start an argument in bad faith, no doubt with all sorts of rhetorical talking points prepared designed to catch the other side in a gotcha. Attempting to engage just takes you into his prepared talking points and responses, while evading the question or refusing to answer makes him feel like he's "won," and leaves his words unchallenged.
The only thing you can really do is to take him off script and take the wind out of his sails. Nansen was prepared for the possibility that they'd answer, and prepared for the possibility that they'd refuse to engage, but he didn't have a plan for what to do if someone put a shoe on their head.
Also, by treating himself unseriously and humbling himself, Joshu removes Nansen's motivation to prove his superiority and the superiority of his house. Joshu essentially "shows his belly," and says through his actions, "Bro, I'm just a silly little guy, if you wanna kill that cat, that's all you." Nansen's internal justification for killing the cat could only be that he wanted to knock the other side down off their high horse, and so by abandoning any sense of dignity he would remove that motivation, and the cat's life would be saved.
By both having the wisdom to understand Nansen's thought process, and having the humility to put aside his dignity for the sake of saving the life of an innocent being, Joshu ironically displays a better grasp of Buddhist teachings than Nansen, regardless of whether Nansen could beat him in a debate through wordplay and rhetoric.
Neat :) thanks for that
I am enlightened!
Rhetoric is like Excel, it can make anything look sensible.
Rhetoric literally just means the means of persuasion so you just said anything is believable if you're a big enough sucker.
Actually true, tho~
Those koans were stories written by Mumon. They weren't all based entirely on real events. Maybe Nansen gave a dharma talk where he said he would kill the cat, but to actually kill it would go against the precepts. Highly doubtful that actually happened.
The point of the koan isn't surface level though, and if you expect to be able to extract a lesson from a koan by one simple reading, then you're approaching koans wrong to begin with.
Mumon's commentaries might help guide your understanding, and perhaps secondary scholarship like a translator's notes or whatever. But unless you're viewing it from inside the tradition, it's likely to seem obscure/perplexing.
But unless you already understand what he means by "say a word of Zen," and why Joshu placing a sandal on his head was taken as an acceptable answer, then this story will elude you no matter how you look at it.
load more comments
(3 replies)
A Buddhist monk walks up to a hot dog stand and says "Make me one with everything."
The hot dog vendor hands over the sausage and bun with all the trimmings, and the Buddhist hands over a twenty. The vendor pockets it.
The Buddhist asks “Where’s my change?” and the vendor replies “change must come from within”.
Then the Buddhist pulls out a pistol and sights it on the hot dog vendor. The vendor holds up his hands and says, "Whoa, whatever happened to inner peace?"
The Buddhist replies, "This is my inner piece."
The hot dog vendor scoffed confidently, "You won't shoot, you don't have the nerve on ya'."
A piano falls on the buddhist and kills him. The hot dog vendor was enlightened.
Reminds me of this excellent video of a newscaster trying to tell a version of this joke to the actual Dalai Lama and absolutely flopping
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why are all buddhist stories like this?
Anon has apparently never read a buddhist story
Everyone here is wrong and the gum on your shoe is a rock on your Lake. If you look at it.
If you immediately know the candlelight is fire, then the meal was cooked a long time ago.
Yes but yet A tree has leaves even when you eat dinner.
'Then buddha detonates 20 old people'
Buddha did say you could put whatever you want on your pizza, even if he himself didn’t like it, which is pretty fucking based as far as religions go.
Buddha never had someone order durian pizza for the group.
The most Zen thing would be to eat it all up, every bite, and say nothing since obviously durian pizza for the group would be intended to get a rise from them. You accept the adversity, and learn never to let that guy order pizza for the group ever again.
Durian pizza is quite popular in China, people buy it unironically.
I also tried Durian coffee. I could still taste it 4 hours later.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Those who know do not speak; those who speak do not know
Unless you can master your anger, your anger will become your master
But the guy who said that was speaking
Unless he wrote it down.
I know it is a shitpost but I think the goal is sometimes to force a student to move away from thought.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That’s Zen Buddhism which is like that.
Theravada Buddhism is different, it’s actually comprehensible.
You haven't read much Abhidharma if "comprehensible" is how you would describe Theravada.
Not saying anything is wrong with Theravada. Entire cultures are built on its principles. But it takes a surface-level glance to think of it as something simple and easy to understand.
Zen though, most of the teachings are about pedagogical methods rather than doctrine. That's why it sounds weird to westerners who think of "religion" as dusty old books and priests who tell you what to do/think.
Zen teachings literally tell you "Don't cling to fixed ideas. Don't seek answers from some external authority figure." Everything they teach is about guiding you to internalize those things. It's about showing, not telling.
So expecting it to "make sense" in the lens of "just let me read a book that will tell me what to believe" is already starting from the wrong foot.
If you meet the Buddha on the road, tell him I said hi.
If you meet Buddha on the road, fucking shank that bitch, he owes me $20
Are you the hot dog guy?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Mahayana can be pretty out there too.
Siddhattha overhears these doubts being expressed so he takes of his clothes, spreads his legs and shows the ladies what is there - and what was there is his kosohitavatthaguyha glowing with a golden light. Then a lotus appeared and from its centre a baby boy’s penis emerges which gradually grows into an adult’s. More lotuses appear, each with a bodhisattva in it. The sutra doesn’t record what the ladies-in-waiting said about this extraordinary exhibition
https://sdhammika.blogspot.com/2010/08/strangest-sutra-of-them-all.html>
When I googled "kosohitavatthaguyha" I found this
According to the Tipiṭaka, one of the 32 Signs of a Great Man is that ‘the cloth-hidden is encased in a sheath’ (kosohitavatthaguyha, M.II,135). This was interpreted to mean that the Buddha’s penis could be drawn into the body and remain there as with some animals like horses, cattle and elephants.
the banyan tree was considered sacred, and the Buddha is supposed to have had the proportions of a banyan tree (nigrodhaparimaṇḍala), i.e. the length of his outstretched arms equalled his height. He is supposed to have had long curved eye lashes (gopakhuma) and a very long tongue (pahūtajivhā), both of which are features of the cow, an animal the Indians greatly revered.
According to the Ṛg Veda, an attractive penis would be big and thick like a club. The Atharva Veda has a prayer to make the penis long and hard like a taut bow and also contains spells to make it as long as that of the wild ass, the elephant or the stallion. The Rāmāyana on the other hand, describes the auspicious man as having a slender, short penis with a smooth glans and drooping testicles. The Buddha seems to have had an aesthetic appreciation for this part of the male anatomy too.
It seems probable that like the ancient Greeks, the Buddha’s contemporaries considered having a penis whose foreskin (kosa) remained over the glans (makula) when either flaccid or erect, to be a sign of beauty and nobility and that at a later period this physical characteristic was attributed to the Buddha.
I didn't know Buddhism had so much dick lore ~ I want that horse cock spell.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2026
451 points (96.7% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
42473 readers
4449 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS